These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33084469)

  • 1. The "Casting Couch" Scenario: Impact of Perceived Employment Benefit, Reporting Delay, Complainant Gender, and Participant Gender on Juror Decision-Making in Rape Cases.
    Mcintosh S; Davis JP
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 May; 37(9-10):NP6676-NP6696. PubMed ID: 33084469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Juror Decision Making in Acquaintance and Marital Rape: The Influence of Clothing, Alcohol, and Preexisting Stereotypical Attitudes.
    Osborn K; Davis JP; Button S; Foster J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Mar; 36(5-6):NP2675-NP2696. PubMed ID: 29629635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Delayed Reporting on Mock-Juror Decision-Making in the Era of #MeToo.
    Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jul; 37(13-14):NP11791-NP11810. PubMed ID: 33636996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Juror characteristics on trial: Investigating how psychopathic traits, rape attitudes, victimization experiences, and juror demographics influence decision-making in an intimate partner rape trial.
    Lilley C; Willmott D; Mojtahedi D
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():1086026. PubMed ID: 36727087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons.
    Devine K; Mojtahedi D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101714. PubMed ID: 34062383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape?
    Parsons A; Mojtahedi D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Counts as Rape? The Effect of Offense Prototypes, Victim Stereotypes, and Participant Gender on How the Complainant and Defendant are Perceived.
    McKimmie BM; Masser BM; Bongiorno R
    J Interpers Violence; 2014 Aug; 29(12):2273-2303. PubMed ID: 24470567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of expert witness testimony and complainant cognitive statements on mock jurors' perceptions of rape trial testimony.
    Ryan N; Westera N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):693-705. PubMed ID: 31984046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effects of Victim Gender Identity, Juror Gender, and Judicial Instructions on Victim Blaming, Crime Severity Ratings, and Verdicts in Sexual Assault Trials.
    Carter LM; Goodmon LB; Urs M; Rutledge-Jukes H
    J Homosex; 2023 May; 70(6):1187-1224. PubMed ID: 35171085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intoxicated But Not Incapacitated: Are There Effective Methods to Assist Juries in Interpreting Evidence of Voluntary Complainant Intoxication in Cases of Rape?
    Nitschke FT; Masser BM; McKimmie BM; Riachi M
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):4335-4359. PubMed ID: 30058439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Impact of Rape Myth Education on Jury Decision-Making: A Systematic Review.
    Hudspith LF; Wager N; Willmott D; Gallagher B
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2024 Dec; 25(5):4062-4077. PubMed ID: 39268945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Police reporting in cases of sexual assault - a 10-year study of reported cases, unreported cases, and cases with delayed reporting.
    Stokbæk S; Kristensen CL; Astrup BS
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Sep; 17(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 34272659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations.
    Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.
    Anderson A; Wingrove T; Fox P; McLean K; Styer E
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 May; 33(9):1449-1471. PubMed ID: 26621035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in Certitude, Adherence, and Attitude: Immediate Effects of Rape Myth Intervention on Jurors in a Mock Trial.
    Pang Y; Davies K; Liu Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(16):. PubMed ID: 36011977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rape Myths and Verdict Systems: What Is Influencing Conviction Rates in Rape Trials in Scotland?
    Curley LJ; Lages M; Sime PJ; Munro J
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2024 Jul; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 39062442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impacts of Victim Resistance and Type of Assault on Legal Decision-Making in Child Sexual Assault.
    Rawn KP; Levi MM; Pals AM; Huber H; Golding JM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2023 May; 32(4):418-437. PubMed ID: 36809071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An archival analysis of actual cases of historic child sexual abuse: A comparison of jury and bench trials.
    Read JD; Connolly DA; Welsh A
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):259-85. PubMed ID: 16786401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility?
    Nitschke FT; McKimmie BM; Vanman EJ
    Psychol Bull; 2019 Oct; 145(10):953-979. PubMed ID: 31282696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual Assault Supportive Attitudes: Rape Myth Acceptance and Token Resistance in Greek and Non-Greek College Students From Two University Samples in the United States.
    Canan SN; Jozkowski KN; Crawford BL
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 Nov; 33(22):3502-3530. PubMed ID: 26944340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.