These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33084523)

  • 1. Balancing cognitive and environmental constraints when deciding to switch tasks: Exploring self-reported task-selection strategies in self-organised multitasking.
    Mittelstädt V; Schaffernak I; Miller J; Kiesel A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Apr; 74(4):598-609. PubMed ID: 33084523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J; Kiesel A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jul; 46(5):699-715. PubMed ID: 29524178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linking task selection to task performance: Internal and predictable external processing constraints jointly influence voluntary task switching behavior.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1529-1548. PubMed ID: 31436454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self-Organized Task Switching.
    Monno I; Spitzer M; Miller J; Dignath D; Kiesel A
    J Cogn; 2021 Jan; 4(1):8. PubMed ID: 33554029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching.
    Mittelstädt V; Dignath D; Schmidt-Ott M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 28871331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 28752317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The self-organized task switching paradigm: Movement effort matters.
    Langhanns C; Monno I; Maurer H; Ebel J; Müller H; Kiesel A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Nov; 221():103446. PubMed ID: 34775275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task intentions and their implementation into actions: cognitive control from adolescence to middle adulthood.
    Poljac E; Haartsen R; van der Cruijsen R; Kiesel A; Poljac E
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):215-229. PubMed ID: 29026993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Switching between different cognitive strategies induces switch costs as evidenced by switches between manual and mental object rotation.
    Weis PP; Kunde W
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6217. PubMed ID: 38485965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate N - 2 repetition costs in task switching?
    Schuch S; Sommer A; Lukas S
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 29147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The temporal dynamics of task processing and choice in a novel multitasking paradigm.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Heins S; Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jul; 88(5):1737-1757. PubMed ID: 38733537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Partitioning switch costs when investigating task switching in relation to media multitasking.
    Schneider DW; Chun H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):910-917. PubMed ID: 33634358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the functional locus of language switching: evidence from a PRP paradigm.
    Hirsch P; Declerck M; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():1-6. PubMed ID: 26280496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are some effector systems harder to switch to? In search of cost asymmetries when switching between manual, vocal, and oculomotor tasks.
    Hoffmann MA; Koch I; Huestegge L
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1563-1577. PubMed ID: 35199283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual preferences for task coordination strategies in multitasking: exploring the link between preferred modes of processing and strategies of response organization.
    Brüning J; Reissland J; Manzey D
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):577-591. PubMed ID: 32006093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance.
    Reissland J; Manzey D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jul; 168():27-40. PubMed ID: 27155317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching.
    Arrington CM; Weaver SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):664-79. PubMed ID: 25283557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Common Cognitive Control Processes Underlying Performance in Task-Switching and Dual-Task Contexts.
    Hirsch P; Nolden S; Declerck M; Koch I
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2018; 14(3):62-74. PubMed ID: 32336999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.