165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33084960)
1. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite™ mesh system: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction.
Chill HH; Gutman-Ido E; Navon I; Reuveni-Salzman A; Haj-Yahya R; Shveiky D
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1513-1518. PubMed ID: 33084960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal Colposuspension Using the Uphold Lite Mesh System versus Transvaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A Comparative Study.
Chill HH; Navon I; Reuveni-Salzman A; Cohen A; Dick A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 33713835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long term surgical outcomes of vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite™ mesh system vs. vaginal vault uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse.
Lozo S; Chill HH; Botros C; Goldberg RP; Gafni-Kane A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jan; 280():150-153. PubMed ID: 36493584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction After Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy for Anterior and Apical Prolapse.
Haj Yahya R; Chill HH; Herzberg S; Asfour A; Lesser S; Shveiky D
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(5):352-355. PubMed ID: 28658003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vermeulen CKM; Schuurman B; Coolen AWM; Meijs-Hermanns PR; van Leijsen SAL; Veen J; Bongers MY
BJOG; 2023 Dec; 130(13):1568-1578. PubMed ID: 37271736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absorbable versus Permanent Suture for Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse.
Chill HH; Cohen-Milun G; Cohen A; Moss NP; Winer JD; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):784-790. PubMed ID: 35283321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of laparoscopic techniques for apical organ prolapse repair - a systematic review of the literature.
Szymczak P; Grzybowska ME; Wydra DG
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Nov; 38(8):2031-2050. PubMed ID: 31452267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study.
Milani R; Manodoro S; Cola A; Bellante N; Palmieri S; Frigerio M
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 31848662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes and uroflowmetry assessment in patients with apical prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension.
Ma Y; Zhang Y; Ma C; Wang Y; Tian W; Zhu L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Apr; 259():12-17. PubMed ID: 33550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mesh-Free Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Uterine Prolapse.
Jan H; Ghai V; Doumouchtsis SK
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(6):952-953. PubMed ID: 29274382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
Xu H; Ding H; Shi C; Ge Q
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 52(10):102634. PubMed ID: 37500012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
Geoffrion R; Larouche M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
Izett-Kay ML; Rahmanou P; Cartwright RJ; Price N; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison.
Gopinath D; Yong C; Harding-Forrester S; McIntyre F; McKenzie D; Carey M
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 35881174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension combined with cervical amputation in treatment of women severe uterine prolapsed at child-bearing period].
Sun Z; Zhu L; Hu H; Lang J; Shi H; Gong X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 49(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 24820298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
