These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33087248)

  • 1. Can ceramic veneer spark erosion and mechanical cycling affect the accuracy of milled complete-arch frameworks supported by 6 implants?
    Del Rio Silva L; Velôso DV; Barbin T; Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):772-778. PubMed ID: 33087248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3D metal printing in dentistry: An in vitro biomechanical comparative study of two additive manufacturing technologies for full-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Barbin T; Velôso DV; Del Rio Silva L; Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Barão VAR; Mesquita MF
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Aug; 108():103821. PubMed ID: 32469723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Additive Manufacturing of Metallic Frameworks Supported by the All-on-Six Implant Concept: Dimensional Precision After Veneer Layering and Spark Erosion.
    Velôso DV; Barbin T; Del Rio Silva L; Borges GA; Camacho Presotto AG; Mesquita MF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):700-708. PubMed ID: 35904826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical behavior of CAD/CAM cobalt-chromium and zirconia full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Barbin T; Silva LDR; Velôso DV; Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Barão VAR; Groppo FC; Ferraz Mesquita M
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 12(6):329-337. PubMed ID: 33489016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hot isostatic pressing as an alternative thermo-mechanical treatment for metallic full-arch implant-supported frameworks obtained by additive and subtractive manufacturing technology: Vertical and horizontal fit, screw removal torque, and stress analysis.
    Barbin T; Borges GA; Jardini AL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Sep; 33(S1):70-80. PubMed ID: 38513224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
    de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of spark erosion on the fit of screw-retained Co-Cr fixed complete denture frameworks veneered with different materials.
    Presotto AGC; Oliveira LV; Pisani MX; Barão VAR; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 28969917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Additively Manufactured Titanium and Cobalt-Chromium Implant Frameworks: Fit and Effect of Ceramic Veneering.
    Svanborg P; Eliasson A; Stenport V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(3):590-596. PubMed ID: 29763497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
    Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
    Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of porcelain veneer fracture in implant-supported fixed full-arch prostheses with a framework of either titanium, cobalt-chromium, or zirconia: An in vitro study.
    Vahnström M; Johansson PH; Svanborg P; Stenport VF
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Apr; 8(2):544-551. PubMed ID: 35313086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fit and Stability of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Frameworks Under Masticatory Simulation: Influence of Cylinder Type.
    Bhering CL; Marques Ida S; Takahashi JM; Barão VA; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Aug; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 26465960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants.
    Abduo J; Lyons K; Waddell N; Bennani V; Swain M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e20-9. PubMed ID: 21414138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrepancy at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface of complete-arch cobalt-chromium implant frameworks fabricated by additive and subtractive technologies before and after ceramic veneering.
    Revilla-León M; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Pérez-López J; Rubenstein J; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):795-803. PubMed ID: 32461043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fit of cobalt-chromium implant frameworks before and after ceramic veneering in comparison with CNC-milled titanium frameworks.
    Svanborg P; Stenport V; Eliasson A
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2015 Dec; 1(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 29744140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The precision of fit of cast and milled full-arch implant-supported restorations.
    Paniz G; Stellini E; Meneghello R; Cerardi A; Gobbato EA; Bressan E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 23748298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro comparison of joint stability of implant-supported fixed prosthetic suprastructures retained with different prosthetic screws and levels of fit under masticatory simulation conditions.
    Farina AP; Spazzin AO; Pantoja JM; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):833-8. PubMed ID: 22848885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.