These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33087454)

  • 1. Optimising the process for conducting scoping reviews.
    Pawliuk C; Brown HL; Widger K; Dewan T; Hermansen AM; Grégoire MC; Steele R; Siden HH
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2021 Dec; 26(6):312. PubMed ID: 33087454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 33038124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
    Munn Z; Peters MDJ; Stern C; Tufanaru C; McArthur A; Aromataris E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 30453902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Implement; 2021 Mar; 19(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 33570328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols.
    Peters MDJ; Godfrey C; McInerney P; Khalil H; Larsen P; Marnie C; Pollock D; Tricco AC; Munn Z
    JBI Evid Synth; 2022 Apr; 20(4):953-968. PubMed ID: 35102103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.
    Peters MD; Godfrey CM; Khalil H; McInerney P; Parker D; Soares CB
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 26134548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review.
    Gates M; Gates A; Guitard S; Pollock M; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):254. PubMed ID: 33148319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis.
    Munn Z; Pollock D; Khalil H; Alexander L; Mclnerney P; Godfrey CM; Peters M; Tricco AC
    JBI Evid Synth; 2022 Apr; 20(4):950-952. PubMed ID: 35249995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A scoping approach to systematically review published reviews: Adaptations and recommendations.
    Schultz A; Goertzen L; Rothney J; Wener P; Enns J; Halas G; Katz A
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):116-123. PubMed ID: 29032590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions.
    Khalil H; Peters MD; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Munn Z
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():156-160. PubMed ID: 33122034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of a cancer diagnosis on the income of adult cancer survivors: a scoping review protocol.
    El Adam S; Bentley C; McQuarrie L; Teckle P; Peacock S
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e047315. PubMed ID: 34531208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mismatches in the production of a scoping review: Highlighting the interplay of (in)formalities.
    Sager M; Pistone I
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 31368185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.
    Colquhoun HL; Levac D; O'Brien KK; Straus S; Tricco AC; Perrier L; Kastner M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1291-4. PubMed ID: 25034198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Designing, planning, and conducting systematic reviews and other knowledge syntheses: Six key practical recommendations to improve feasibility and efficiency.
    Fontaine G; Maheu-Cadotte MA; Lavallée A; Mailhot T; Lavoie P; Rouleau G; Vinette B; García MR; Bourbonnais A
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2022 Dec; 19(6):434-441. PubMed ID: 36317824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework.
    Daudt HM; van Mossel C; Scott SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():48. PubMed ID: 23522333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.