These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33088029)

  • 1. Indigenous Technique as an Effective Liquid-Based Cytology Tool for Multiple Single-Layered Cell Preparations.
    Sharma S; Dey P
    J Cytol; 2020; 37(3):122-125. PubMed ID: 33088029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC) technique and direct smear technique (conventional) on fine-needle cytology/fine-needle aspiration cytology samples.
    Pawar PS; Gadkari RU; Swami SY; Joshi AR
    J Cytol; 2014 Apr; 31(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 25210235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Pilot Study Evaluating Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of Ancillary Immunocytochemistry and Cytomorphological Characteristics of SurePathâ„¢ Liquid-Based Preparations with Conventional Smears.
    Lee CH; Chung SY; Moon KC; Park IA; Chung YR; Ryu HS
    Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 26044824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of manual liquid-based cytology and conventional smears in the evaluation of various fine-needle aspiration samples.
    Arul P
    J Cytol; 2016; 33(4):177-181. PubMed ID: 28028330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of liquid-based preparation and conventional smear of fine-needle aspiration cytology of lymph node.
    Singh P; Rohilla M; Dey P
    J Cytol; 2016; 33(4):187-191. PubMed ID: 28028332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of two liquid-based preparation methods: membrane-based and sedimentation in fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis in thyroid nodules.
    Zhao J; Yao X; Song C; Wang C
    World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jan; 18(1):13. PubMed ID: 31948446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fine needle aspiration cytology of cervical lymph nodes: Comparison of liquid based cytology (SurePath) and conventional preparation.
    Budhwar A; Kataria SP; Kumar S; Singh G; Kaushik N; Sen R
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jan; 49(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 32841545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of liquid based cytology and conventional smears on lymph node aspirates: A cytomorphological study.
    Shahab J; Ahuja S; Singh M; Verma P; Ranga S
    Cytojournal; 2024; 21():7. PubMed ID: 38469400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparative Analysis of Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Smears in Fine-Needle Aspirates of Thyroid Lesions.
    Maurya MK; Yadav R; Kumar M; Singh HP; Mishra A; Goel MM
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45353. PubMed ID: 37849573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in the evaluation of abdominal masses.
    Choudhury M; Pahwa AR
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020; 63(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 32031126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations on fine needle aspiration cytology material.
    Dey P; Luthra UK; George J; Zuhairy F; George SS; Haji BI
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 10667159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in FNA samples.
    Tripathy K; Misra A; Ghosh JK
    J Cytol; 2015; 32(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 25948938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology in fine-needle aspirates of salivary gland neoplasms.
    Kumar M; Katiyar S; Sagar M; Kumari M; Goel MM
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2018; 61(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 29567883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Analysis of Liquid based and Conventional Cytology Smears in Fine Needle Aspirates from Breast Lesions.
    Sharma V; Gupta V; Parmar P; Jain P; Thakran D; Sen R
    J Cytol; 2019; 36(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 30992643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Liquid-based versus conventional cytology in solid pediatric neoplasm: Comparison of their diagnostic and morphological spectra.
    Agarwal P; Yadav S; Kumar A; Goel MM
    J Cytol; 2016; 33(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 28028334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tumor Cell Representation by an Improvised Technique of Fine-Needle Aspiration Specimen Acquisition and Cell Block Preparation: Our Experience in Lung Cancer Cases in a Peripheral Center of Eastern India.
    Boler AK; Roy S; Bandyopadhyay A; Bandyopadhyay A; Ghosh MK
    J Cytol; 2020; 37(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 32606496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The false negative rate in cervical cytology. Comparison of monolayers to conventional smears.
    Sprenger E; Schwarzmann P; Kirkpatrick M; Fox W; Heinzerling RH; Geyer JW; Knesel EA
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 8604579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Conventional Smear and Liquid-based Cytology Preparation in Diagnosis of Lung Cancer by Bronchial Wash and Transbronchial Needle Aspiration.
    Nalwa A; Walia R; Singh V; Madan K; Mathur S; Iyer V; Jain D
    J Cytol; 2018; 35(2):94-98. PubMed ID: 29643656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examination of Selective Low-pressure Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Under Ultrasound Guidance.
    Shimode Y; Tsuji H; Fukuhara T; Kawakami O; Tsutsumiuchi T; Noda T; Yamada K; Kishimoto K; Nakata S; Terauchi R; Nakano M; Nojima T; Takeuchi H
    Yonago Acta Med; 2017 Sep; 60(3):209-212. PubMed ID: 28959134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of FNAC smears, cytospin smears, and cellblocks of transthoracic guided FNAC of suspected lung tumor: A study of 100 cases.
    Kshatriya AS; Santwani PM
    J Cytol; 2016; 33(3):141-144. PubMed ID: 27756986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.