These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33088242)

  • 21. [Inter-observer agreement in the Paprosky classification in a hospital in a country of an emerging economy].
    Macedonio-García A; Rivera-Villa AH; Quiroz-Williams J; Aguilera-Martínez P
    Acta Ortop Mex; 2021; 35(3):257-260. PubMed ID: 34921534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Humeral Bone Loss in Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: the Proximal Humeral Arthroplasty Revision Osseous inSufficiency (PHAROS) Classification System.
    Chalmers PN; Romeo AA; Nicholson GP; Boileau P; Keener JD; Gregory JM; Salazar DH; Tashjian RZ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):432-441. PubMed ID: 30601321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
    Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
    Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
    Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Matta JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 12954828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Mancino F; Cacciola G; Di Matteo V; De Marco D; Greenberg A; Perisano C; Ma M; Sculco PK; Maccauro G; De Martino I
    Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2020 Jun; 12(Suppl 1):8655. PubMed ID: 32913591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of plain radiographic measurements after total hip arthroplasty.
    Mahmood SS; Al-Amiry B; Mukka SS; Baea S; Sayed-Noor AS
    Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Mar; 44(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 25403426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Outcomes of Revisions of the Acetabular Component of THA with Paprosky Type 3a and 3b Defects Using Tantalum Trabecular Metal Implants 2-10 Years Postoperatively].
    Musil D; Trnka T; Klouda J; PertlÍČek J; Held M; StehlÍk J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(6):387-395. PubMed ID: 33408003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification.
    Wirtz DC; Jaenisch M; Osterhaus TA; Gathen M; Wimmer M; Randau TM; Schildberg FA; Rössler PP
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Jun; 140(6):815-825. PubMed ID: 32100108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fate of bone grafting for acetabular defects in total hip replacement.
    Oommen AT; Krishnamoorthy VP; Poonnoose PM; Korula RJ
    Indian J Orthop; 2015; 49(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 26015607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Reconstruction of acetabular bone deficiency in total hip arthroplasty].
    Yang B; Lin J; Weng XS; Jin J; Zhao Q; Qiu GX
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 47(12):920-3. PubMed ID: 19781247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Reconstruction of the severe acetabular bone defect by using metal mesh and impaction bone grafting technique].
    Zhou YG; Zhang Q; Wang Y
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 47(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 19563068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Effectiveness of acetabular revision using a metal reconstruction cage].
    You Z; Sun J; Jiang Y; Liu S; Wu K; Li Z; Qin L
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 31(6):641-646. PubMed ID: 29798642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. What Is the Reliability of a New Classification for Bone Defects in Revision TKA Based on Preoperative Radiographs?
    Belt M; Smulders K; van Houten A; Wymenga A; Heesterbeek P; van Hellemondt G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2057-2064. PubMed ID: 32023232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Current study on classification of bone deficiency in the revision of total hip replacement].
    Gao ZB; Wang ZS; Wang ZQ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Jun; 22(6):480-2. PubMed ID: 19594061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Standard Versus Custom-Made Acetabular Implants in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Tikhilov RM; Dzhavadov AA; Kovalenko AN; Bilyk SS; Denisov AO; Shubnyakov II
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jan; 37(1):119-125. PubMed ID: 34598861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring With a Hook: A Precise Follow-Up, at Average 11.4 Years, of a Previous Report.
    Park KS; Seon JK; Lee KB; Kim SK; Chan CK; Yoon TR
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):503-509. PubMed ID: 27546473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.
    Schmolders J; Friedrich MJ; Michel RD; Randau TM; Wimmer MD; Strauss AC; Kohlhof H; Wirtz DC; Gravius S
    Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 25277762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after a previous acetabular reconstruction with use of a bulk femoral head graft in patients who had congenital dislocation or dysplasia. A follow-up note.
    Bal BS; Maurer T; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1703-6. PubMed ID: 10608381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability and Validity of the Vancouver Classification in Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cementless Femoral Stems.
    Lee S; Kagan R; Wang L; Doung YC
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S277-S281. PubMed ID: 30922672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.