BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33089957)

  • 1. Measuring the quality of scientific references in Wikipedia: an analysis of more than 115M citations to over 800 000 scientific articles.
    Nicholson JM; Uppala A; Sieber M; Grabitz P; Mordaunt M; Rife SC
    FEBS J; 2021 Jul; 288(14):4242-4248. PubMed ID: 33089957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature.
    Bould MD; Hladkowicz ES; Pigford AA; Ufholz LA; Postonogova T; Shin E; Boet S
    BMJ; 2014 Mar; 348():g1585. PubMed ID: 24603564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncited Research Articles in Popular United States General Radiology Journals.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Chung R; Duszak R
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):282-285. PubMed ID: 29731421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of gastroenterology and hepatology articles on Wikipedia: are they suitable as learning resources for medical students?
    Azer SA
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Feb; 26(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 24276492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of reference sources used in drug-related Wikipedia articles.
    Koppen L; Phillips J; Papageorgiou R
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 26213506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks.
    Arroyo-Machado W; Torres-Salinas D; Herrera-Viedma E; Romero-Frías E
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228713. PubMed ID: 32040488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis.
    Jemielniak D; Masukume G; Wilamowski M
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):e11429. PubMed ID: 30664451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making your database available through Wikipedia: the pros and cons.
    Finn RD; Gardner PP; Bateman A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Jan; 40(Database issue):D9-12. PubMed ID: 22144683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inaccurate Citations in Biomedical Journalism: Effect on the Impact Factor of the American Journal of Roentgenology.
    Karabulut N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Mar; 208(3):472-474. PubMed ID: 28026206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the scientific research productivity of a Brazilian healthcare institution: a case study at the Heart Institute of São Paulo, Brazil.
    Tess BH; Furuie SS; Castro RC; Barreto Mdo C; Nobre MR
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2009; 64(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 19578662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
    Brandt JS; Hadaya O; Schuster M; Rosen T; Sauer MV; Ananth CV
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Dec; 2(12):e1918007. PubMed ID: 31860106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decay of references to Web sites in articles published in general medical journals: mainstream vs small journals.
    Habibzadeh P
    Appl Clin Inform; 2013; 4(4):455-64. PubMed ID: 24454575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of Wikipedia as a resource for patient education in nephrology.
    Thomas GR; Eng L; de Wolff JF; Grover SC
    Semin Dial; 2013; 26(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 23432369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Brazilian scientific journals in speech-language and hearing science: impact indicator].
    Campanatti-Ostiz H; de Andrade CR
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 16625876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'WP2Cochrane', a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance.
    Joorabchi A; Doherty C; Dawson J
    Health Informatics J; 2020 Sep; 26(3):1881-1897. PubMed ID: 31868082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Dentistry in Wikipedia: A quantitative and qualitative analysis].
    Lorenz A; Türp JC
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2010; 120(12):1117-26. PubMed ID: 21261123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited cardiovascular articles.
    Shuaib W; Khan MS; Shahid H; Valdes EA; Alweis R
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 115(7):972-81. PubMed ID: 25670637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.
    Massarrat S; Kolahdoozan S
    Arch Iran Med; 2011 Nov; 14(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 22039839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evidence rating service provided valid correlates of the clinical importance of medical articles and journals.
    Haynes RB; Budhram D; Cherian J; Iserman E; Iorio A; Lokker C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 May; 109():80-89. PubMed ID: 30731116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor.
    Weale AR; Bailey M; Lear PA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 May; 4():14. PubMed ID: 15169549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.