These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33091644)
1. Association of Neurosurgical Work Relative Value Units with Objective Markers of Operative Complexity. Chiu RG; Siddiqui N; Nunna RS; Patel S; Rosinski CL; Chaker AN; Hobbs JG; Mehta AI World Neurosurg; 2021 Feb; 146():e194-e204. PubMed ID: 33091644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of Relative Value Units With Surgical Complexity and Physician Workload in Urology. Gan ZS; Wood CM; Hayon S; Deal A; Smith AB; Tan HJ; Pruthi RS Urology; 2020 May; 139():71-77. PubMed ID: 32084413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of Work Measures and Specialty With Assigned Work Relative Value Units Among Surgeons. Childers CP; Dworsky JQ; Russell MM; Maggard-Gibbons M JAMA Surg; 2019 Oct; 154(10):915-921. PubMed ID: 31314063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What provides a better value for your time? The use of relative value units to compare posterior segmental instrumentation of vertebral segments. Orr RD; Sodhi N; Dalton SE; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Chughtai M; Newman JM; Savage J; Mroz TE; Mont MA Spine J; 2018 Oct; 18(10):1727-1732. PubMed ID: 29410308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units. Ramsey T; Ostrowski T; Curran K; Mouzakes J; Gildener-Leapman N Ochsner J; 2021; 21(4):371-380. PubMed ID: 34984052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Relative value units poorly correlate with measures of surgical effort and complexity. Shah DR; Bold RJ; Yang AD; Khatri VP; Martinez SR; Canter RJ J Surg Res; 2014 Aug; 190(2):465-70. PubMed ID: 24953983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Work Relative Value Units Do Not Adequately Support the Burden of Infection Management in Revision Knee Arthroplasty. Samuel LT; Grits D; Acuña AJ; Piuzzi NS; Higuera-Rueda CA; Kamath AF J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Feb; 102(3):230-236. PubMed ID: 31609889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between Relative Value Units and Operative Time for Flap-Based Reconstruction Procedures. Dibbs RP; Skochdopole A; Reul RM; Beh HZ; Ferry AM; Conlon CJ; O'Neill R; Reece E; Winocour S Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Feb; 151(2):299e-307e. PubMed ID: 36696331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative outcomes for pediatric neurosurgical procedures: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics. Kuo BJ; Vissoci JR; Egger JR; Smith ER; Grant GA; Haglund MM; Rice HE J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Mar; 19(3):361-371. PubMed ID: 28059679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National Undervaluation of Cleft Surgical Services: Evidence from a Comparative Analysis of 50,450 Cases. Rochlin DH; Chaya BF; Flores RL Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Mar; 151(3):603-610. PubMed ID: 36730532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancies Created by Surgeon Self-Reported Operative Time and the Effects on Procedural Relative Value Units and Reimbursement. Uppal S; Rice LW; Spencer RJ Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 138(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 34237766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are We Appropriately Compensated by Relative Value Units for Primary vs Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty? Sodhi N; Piuzzi NS; Khlopas A; Newman JM; Kryzak TJ; Stearns KL; Mont MA J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):340-344. PubMed ID: 28993077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary Versus Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Peterson J; Sodhi N; Khlopas A; Piuzzi NS; Newman JM; Sultan AA; Stearns KL; Mont MA J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7S):S39-S42. PubMed ID: 29276122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CPT to RVU conversion improves model performance in the prediction of surgical case length. Garside N; Zaribafzadeh H; Henao R; Chung R; Buckland D Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14169. PubMed ID: 34239005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary versus Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Sodhi N; Yao B; Newman JM; Jawad M; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Lamaj S; Beyer GA; Wilhelm AB; Mont MA Surg Technol Int; 2017 Dec; 31():322-326. PubMed ID: 29316589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reimbursement for Hip Fractures: The Impact of Varied Current Procedural Terminology Coding Using Relative Value Units. Beck CM; Blair SE; Nana AD J Arthroplasty; 2020 Dec; 35(12):3464-3466. PubMed ID: 32741709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost Analysis of Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multi-Institutional Database Study. Denyer S; Eikani C; Bujnowski D; Farooq H; Brown N J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Mar; 105(6):462-467. PubMed ID: 36727914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reimbursement for Female-Specific Compared With Male-Specific Procedures Over Time. Polan RM; Barber EL Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 138(6):878-883. PubMed ID: 34736273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]