631 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33092616)
1. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of distal fibula Danis-Weber types B and C fractures.
Marazzi C; Wittauer M; Hirschmann MT; Testa EA
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Oct; 15(1):491. PubMed ID: 33092616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Fibular Plating for AO/OTA 44-B Ankle Fractures.
Chiang CC; Tzeng YH; Lin CC; Huang CK; Chang MC
Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Jun; 37(6):611-9. PubMed ID: 26740306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using the oblong hole of a locking plate for comminuted distal fibular fractures.
Park YU; Kim SJ; Kim HN
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Apr; 16(1):281. PubMed ID: 33906661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in type B fibular fractures versus open surgery.
Iacobellis C; Chemello C; Zornetta A; Aldegheri R
Musculoskelet Surg; 2013 Dec; 97(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 23900920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison study on two operations for treatment of extra-articular distal tibial fracture].
Qi H; Li W; Zhao Y; Zhang Y; Liu Z; Jia J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(11):1286-90. PubMed ID: 24501883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lateral Locking Plate Fixation of Simple Weber B Fibula Fractures Without a Lag Screw Yields Excellent Radiographic Results.
Mehraban N; Lew AR; Foran IM; Lee S; Bohl DD; Hamid KS
Foot Ankle Spec; 2024 Apr; 17(2):131-136. PubMed ID: 34747245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis versus ORIF for Sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized intervention trial.
Jin C; Weng D; Yang W; He W; Liang W; Qian Y
J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28100253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arthroscopic Reduction and Minimally Invasive Surgery in Supination-External Rotation Ankle Fractures: A Comparative Study With Open Reduction.
Chiang CC; Tzeng YH; Jeff Lin CF; Wang CS; Lin CC; Chang MC
Arthroscopy; 2019 Sep; 35(9):2671-2683. PubMed ID: 31500754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Prospective Randomized Study on Operative Treatment for Simple Distal Tibial Fractures-Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Versus Minimal Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.
Kim JW; Kim HU; Oh CW; Kim JW; Park KC
J Orthop Trauma; 2018 Jan; 32(1):e19-e24. PubMed ID: 28834822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Open vs. closed reduction combined with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in humeral fractures.
Liu YW; Wei XE; Kuang Y; Zheng YX; Gu XF; Zhan HS; Shi YY
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2016 Aug; 25(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 27266386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with locking compression plate in patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Min BW; Cho CH; Son ES; Lee KJ; Lee SW; Min KK
Injury; 2018 Jul; 49(7):1336-1340. PubMed ID: 29807829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of patients with midshaft clavicle fracture fixed with a locked plate via an open versus percutaneous approach.
Machado do Amaral F; Angeli Malavolta E; Brandao Andrade E Silva F; Garcia JC; da Silva Moura J; Assunção JH; Pecora JR
Injury; 2023 Nov; 54 Suppl 6():110746. PubMed ID: 38143119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Treatment of Fractures of the Distal Third of Tibia Diaphysis by MIPO Technique].
Schwarz O; Majerníček M; Chomiak J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 32396512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the distal fibula with the locking compression plate: first experience of 20 cases.
Hess F; Sommer C
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Feb; 25(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 21245715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Humeral Shaft Fractures Is Safer Than Open Reduction Internal Fixation: A Matched Case-Controlled Comparison.
Randell M; Glatt V; Stabler A; Bussoletti T; Hohmann E; Tetsworth K
J Orthop Trauma; 2021 Aug; 35(8):424-429. PubMed ID: 33252449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between open plating versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for acute displaced clavicular shaft fractures.
Sohn HS; Kim WJ; Shon MS
Injury; 2015 Aug; 46(8):1577-84. PubMed ID: 26077663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of post-operative numbness and patient satisfaction using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis or open plating for acute displaced clavicular shaft fractures.
You JM; Wu YS; Wang Y
Int J Surg; 2018 Aug; 56():21-25. PubMed ID: 29890301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does MIPO of fractures of the distal femur result in more rotational malalignment than ORIF? A retrospective study.
Lill M; Attal R; Rudisch A; Wick MC; Blauth M; Lutz M
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2016 Dec; 42(6):733-740. PubMed ID: 26555728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture gap and working length are important actionable factors affecting bone union after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of simple diaphyseal or distal metaphyseal tibia fractures.
Kim TH; Heo YM; Kim KK; Kang C; Kim TG; Lee GS; Shin WJ; Song JH
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Apr; 110(2):103770. PubMed ID: 37979671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs): comparison of functional outcome 1 year after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) versus open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).
Buchmann L; van Lieshout EMM; Zeelenberg M; den Hartog D; Pfeifer R; Allemann F; Pape HC; Halvachizadeh S
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2022 Dec; 48(6):4553-4558. PubMed ID: 34216222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
