These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33093406)

  • 1. Reporting and Handling of Missing Participant Data in Systematic Reviews of Kidney Transplant Studies.
    Budhiraja P; Kalot MA; Alayli AE; Dimassi A; Kaplan B; Chakkera HA; Mustafa RA
    Transplantation; 2021 Aug; 105(8):1708-1717. PubMed ID: 33093406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey.
    Akl EA; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Johnston BC; Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramírez-Morera A; Selva A; Solà I; Sanabria AJ; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Vernooij RW; Zazueta OE; Zhou Q; Guyatt GH; Alonso-Coello P
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e009368. PubMed ID: 26423858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agarwal A; Al-Matari N; Ebrahim S; Alexander PE; Briel M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Diab B; Iorio A; Kwong J; Li L; Lopes LC; Mustafa R; Neumann I; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 3():137. PubMed ID: 25423894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 4():98. PubMed ID: 26202162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic survey shows that reporting and handling of missing outcome data in networks of interventions is poor.
    Spineli LM; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Schünemann HJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 30355280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 26099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey.
    Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Hooft L; Guyatt GH; Scholten RJPM; Akl EA
    Clin Epidemiol; 2020; 12():527-535. PubMed ID: 32547244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey.
    Kahale LA; Diab B; Brignardello-Petersen R; Agarwal A; Mustafa RA; Kwong J; Neumann I; Li L; Lopes LC; Briel M; Busse JW; Iorio A; Vandvik PO; Alexander PE; Guyatt G; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():14-23. PubMed ID: 29505859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide.
    Akl EA; Shawwa K; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008431. PubMed ID: 26719310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Missing binary data extraction challenges from Cochrane reviews in mental health and Campbell reviews with implications for empirical research.
    Spineli LM
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):514-525. PubMed ID: 28961395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study.
    Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Schünemann HJ; Hooft L; Scholten RJ; Guyatt GH; Akl EA
    BMJ; 2020 Aug; 370():m2898. PubMed ID: 32847800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three challenges described for identifying participants with missing data in trials reports, and potential solutions suggested to systematic reviewers.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Ebrahim S; Alonso-Coello P; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():147-54. PubMed ID: 26944294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-epidemiological review identified variable reporting and handling of time-to-event analyses in publications of trials included in meta-analyses of systematic reviews.
    Goldkuhle M; Hirsch C; Iannizzi C; Bora AM; Bender R; van Dalen EC; Hemkens LG; Trivella M; Monsef I; Kreuzberger N; Skoetz N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():174-189. PubMed ID: 37263516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Puljak L; Ramic I; Arriola Naharro C; Brezova J; Lin YC; Surdila AA; Tomajkova E; Farias Medeiros I; Nikolovska M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Barcot O; Suarez Salvado M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():114-119. PubMed ID: 32247026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of bias assessments for selective reporting were inadequate in the majority of Cochrane reviews.
    Saric F; Barcot O; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():53-58. PubMed ID: 31009658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of missing data in follow-up studies of randomised controlled trials: A systematic review of the literature.
    Sullivan TR; Yelland LN; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):387-395. PubMed ID: 28385071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systematic survey showed important limitations in the methods for assessing drug safety among systematic reviews.
    Li L; Deng K; Busse JW; Zhou X; Xu C; Liu Z; Ren Y; Zou K; Sun X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():80-90. PubMed ID: 32247024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How robust are findings of pairwise and network meta-analysis in the presence of missing participant outcome data?
    Spineli LM; Kalyvas C; Papadimitropoulou K
    BMC Med; 2021 Dec; 19(1):323. PubMed ID: 34930276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potentially missing data are considerably more frequent than definitely missing data: a methodological survey of 638 randomized controlled trials.
    Kahale LA; Diab B; Khamis AM; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Guyatt G; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():18-31. PubMed ID: 30300676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.