These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33093406)

  • 41. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Addressing continuous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers.
    Ebrahim S; Akl EA; Mustafa RA; Sun X; Walter SD; Heels-Ansdell D; Alonso-Coello P; Johnston BC; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1014-1021.e1. PubMed ID: 23774111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.
    Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Rees J; Karasoulos D; Felice P; Alissa R; Worthington H; Coulthard P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2010; 3(1):7-26. PubMed ID: 20467595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A guidance was developed to identify participants with missing outcome data in randomized controlled trials.
    Kahale LA; Guyatt GH; Agoritsas T; Briel M; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Khamis AM; Zhang Y; Hooft L; Scholten RJPM; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():55-63. PubMed ID: 31299357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Antiepileptic drugs for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.
    Cooper TE; Wiffen PJ; Heathcote LC; Clinch J; Howard R; Krane E; Lord SM; Sethna N; Schechter N; Wood C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD012536. PubMed ID: 28779491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials.
    Wuytack F; Regan M; Biesty L; Meskell P; Lutomski JE; O'Donnell M; Treweek S; Devane D
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 30621793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Analysis of Findings of Systematic Reviews.
    Manchikanti L; Soin A; Boswell MV; Kaye AD; Sanapati M; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2019 Jul; 22(4):307-322. PubMed ID: 31337160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Many meta-analyses of rare events in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were underpowered.
    Jia P; Lin L; Kwong JSW; Xu C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 131():113-122. PubMed ID: 33271288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Estimating data from figures with a Web-based program: Considerations for a systematic review.
    Burda BU; O'Connor EA; Webber EM; Redmond N; Perdue LA
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Sep; 8(3):258-262. PubMed ID: 28268241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. ROB-ME: a tool for assessing risk of bias due to missing evidence in systematic reviews with meta-analysis.
    Page MJ; Sterne JAC; Boutron I; Hróbjartsson A; Kirkham JJ; Li T; Lundh A; Mayo-Wilson E; McKenzie JE; Stewart LA; Sutton AJ; Bero L; Dunn AG; Dwan K; Elbers RG; Kanukula R; Meerpohl JJ; Turner EH; Higgins JPT
    BMJ; 2023 Nov; 383():e076754. PubMed ID: 37984978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Missing Data in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
    Chandelia S
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e400. PubMed ID: 36165947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. What still remains missing from participants' selection criteria in clinical trials and systematic reviews?
    Miller CS; Carrasco-Labra A; Farag AM; Ariyawardana A; Albuquerque R; Chmieliauskaite M; Glick M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2018 Nov; 149(11):931-934. PubMed ID: 30724166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Information on harm outcomes was insufficiently reported in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of individual participant data.
    Xu C; Kwong JSW; Jia P; Liu Y; Zhang W; Qin Z; Liu T
    J Evid Based Med; 2021 Dec; 14(4):265-268. PubMed ID: 34541821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Intervention synthesis: a missing link between a systematic review and practical treatment(s).
    Glasziou PP; Chalmers I; Green S; Michie S
    PLoS Med; 2014 Aug; 11(8):e1001690. PubMed ID: 25117057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Bias Mechanisms in Intention-to-Treat Analysis With Data Subject to Treatment Noncompliance and Missing Outcomes.
    Jo B
    J Educ Behav Stat; 2007 Jan; 33(2):158-185. PubMed ID: 20689663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Implementing systematic reviews of prognosis studies in Cochrane.
    Moons KG; Hooft L; Williams K; Hayden JA; Damen JA; Riley RD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 10(10):ED000129. PubMed ID: 30306538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Missing participant outcome data in meta-analysis. Part 2.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):632-635. PubMed ID: 34579822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. How to analyze and write the results of a systematic review.
    Robleda G
    Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2019; 30(4):192-195. PubMed ID: 31610924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Critical Analysis: The Often-Missing Step in Conducting Literature Review Research.
    Dodgson JE
    J Hum Lact; 2021 Feb; 37(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 33630706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.