These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33095178)
1. Accuracy of Mobile Device-Compatible 3D Scanners for Facial Digitization: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mai HN; Lee DH J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e22228. PubMed ID: 33095178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Portable Face-Scanning Devices for Obtaining Three-Dimensional Face Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mai HN; Kim J; Choi YH; Lee DH Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33375533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D Anthropometric Facial Imaging - A comparison of different 3D scanners. Koban KC; Perko P; Li Z; Xu Y; Giunta RE; Alfertshofer MG; Kohler LH; Freytag DL; Cotofana S; Frank K Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2022 May; 30(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 35501052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Augmented Reality-Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mai HN; Dam VV; Lee DH J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jan; 25():e42040. PubMed ID: 36598798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the accuracy of a mobile and a stationary system for three-dimensional facial scanning. Modabber A; Peters F; Kniha K; Goloborodko E; Ghassemi A; Lethaus B; Hölzle F; Möhlhenrich SC J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1719-1724. PubMed ID: 27614543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of low-cost mobile phone applications and comparison with professional imaging systems for three-dimensional facial imaging: A pilot study. Loy RCH; Liew MKM; Yong CW; Wong RCW J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104676. PubMed ID: 37633483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of low-cost alternative facial scanners: a prospective cohort study. Bartella AK; Laser J; Kamal M; Krause M; Neuhaus M; Pausch NC; Sander AK; Lethaus B; Zimmerer R Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Mar; 27(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 35249150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of three-dimensional optical devices for facial soft-tissue measurement in clinical practice of stomatology: A PRISMA systematic review. Cao R; Chen B; Xu H; Cai Y; Liu W Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Nov; 101(47):e31922. PubMed ID: 36451461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of two handheld devices against a non-portable three-dimensional surface scanner and assessment of potential use for intraoperative facial imaging. Koban KC; Perko P; Etzel L; Li Z; Schenck TL; Giunta RE J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Jan; 73(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 31519501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Accuracy of Digital Face Scans Obtained from 3D Scanners: An In Vitro Study. Amornvit P; Sanohkan S Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31842255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of measurement accuracy of three facial scanners based on different scanning principles]. Zhao YJ; Xiong YX; Yang HF; Wang Y Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Feb; 46(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24535353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of 3D facial scans: a comparison of three different scanning system in an in vivo study. Pellitteri F; Scisciola F; Cremonini F; Baciliero M; Lombardo L Prog Orthod; 2023 Dec; 24(1):44. PubMed ID: 38143253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the accuracy of different handheld-type scanners in three-dimensional facial image recognition. Tsuchida Y; Shiozawa M; Handa K; Takahashi H; Nikawa H J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Apr; 67(2):222-230. PubMed ID: 35768278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can smartphones be used for routine dental clinical application? A validation study for using smartphone-generated 3D facial images. Singh P; Hsung RT; Ajmera DH; Leung YY; McGrath C; Gu M J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104775. PubMed ID: 37944629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D Scanners in Orthodontics-Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives-A Systematic Review. Jedliński M; Mazur M; Grocholewicz K; Janiszewska-Olszowska J Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33513981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Facial scanning technologies in the era of digital workflow: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Antonacci D; Caponio VCA; Troiano G; Pompeo MG; Gianfreda F; Canullo L J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):321-336. PubMed ID: 36058870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and reliability of a structured-light 3D scanner and an ultrasound imaging system for measurements of facial skin thickness. Lee KW; Kim SH; Gil YC; Hu KS; Kim HJ Clin Anat; 2017 Oct; 30(7):878-886. PubMed ID: 28589650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and reliability of automated three-dimensional facial landmarking in medical and biological studies. A systematic review. Al-Baker B; Alkalaly A; Ayoub A; Ju X; Mossey P Eur J Orthod; 2023 Jul; 45(4):382-395. PubMed ID: 37042196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: A systematic review. Bohner L; Gamba DD; Hanisch M; Marcio BS; Tortamano Neto P; Laganá DC; Sesma N J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):246-251. PubMed ID: 30017156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]