These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33095194)

  • 1. An investigation of the possible scenarios for the optimal locating of quality sensors in the water distribution networks with uncertain contamination.
    Jafari H; Rajaee T; Nazif S
    J Water Health; 2020 Oct; 18(5):704-721. PubMed ID: 33095194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selecting the best location of water quality sensors in water distribution networks by considering the importance of nodes and contaminations using NSGA-III (case study: Zahedan water distribution network, Iran).
    Harif S; Azizyan G; Dehghani Darmian M; Givehchi M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(18):53229-53252. PubMed ID: 36853532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrating fuzzy logic with Pearson correlation to optimize contaminant detection in water distribution system with uncertainty analyses.
    Osmani SA; Banik BK; Ali H
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jun; 191(7):441. PubMed ID: 31203453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient k-means clustering and greedy selection-based reduction of nodal search space for optimization of sensor placement in the water distribution networks.
    Gautam DK; Kotecha P; Subbiah S
    Water Res; 2022 Jul; 220():118666. PubMed ID: 35709596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Locations of Sampling Stations for Water Quality Monitoring in Water Distribution Networks.
    Rathi S; Gupta R
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2014 Apr; 56(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 26563063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pollution source localization in an urban water supply network based on dynamic water demand.
    Yan X; Zhu Z; Li T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(18):17901-17910. PubMed ID: 29079984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gated graph neural networks for identifying contamination sources in water distribution systems.
    Li Z; Liu H; Zhang C; Fu G
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 351():119806. PubMed ID: 38118345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Handling uncertainty in optimal design of reservoir water quality monitoring systems.
    Pourshahabi S; Rakhshandehroo G; Talebbeydokhti N; Nikoo MR; Masoumi F
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Nov; 266(Pt 2):115211. PubMed ID: 32683163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-objective optimization of hydrant flushing in a water distribution system using a fast hybrid technique.
    Shoorangiz M; Nikoo MR; Šimůnek J; Gandomi AH; Adamowski JF; Al-Wardy M
    J Environ Manage; 2023 May; 334():117463. PubMed ID: 36801802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the global resilience of water quality sensor placement strategies within water distribution systems.
    Zhang Q; Zheng F; Kapelan Z; Savic D; He G; Ma Y
    Water Res; 2020 Apr; 172():115527. PubMed ID: 32004913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contamination event detection using multiple types of conventional water quality sensors in source water.
    Liu S; Che H; Smith K; Chen L
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Aug; 16(8):2028-38. PubMed ID: 24953418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pressure Sensor Placement for Leak Localization in Water Distribution Networks Using Information Theory.
    Santos-Ruiz I; López-Estrada FR; Puig V; Valencia-Palomo G; Hernández HR
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 35062403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contamination Event Detection with Multivariate Time-Series Data in Agricultural Water Monitoring.
    Mao Y; Qi H; Ping P; Li X
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Dec; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 29207535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deep reinforcement learning based valve scheduling for pollution isolation in water distribution network.
    Hu CY; Cai JY; Zeng Z; Yan XS; Gong WY; Wang L
    Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Sep; 17(1):105-121. PubMed ID: 31731342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management and health risk assessment of chemical contamination events in water distribution systems using PSO.
    Moghaddam A; Afsharnia M; Mokhtari M; Peirovi-Minaee R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Apr; 194(5):362. PubMed ID: 35416506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Machine-Learning Classification of a Number of Contaminant Sources in an Urban Water Network.
    Lučin I; Grbčić L; Čarija Z; Kranjčević L
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 33401513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contamination source identification in water distribution networks using convolutional neural network.
    Sun L; Yan H; Xin K; Tao T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Dec; 26(36):36786-36797. PubMed ID: 31745764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal sensor placement for leak location in water distribution networks: A feature selection method combined with graph signal processing.
    Cheng M; Li J
    Water Res; 2023 Aug; 242():120313. PubMed ID: 37451191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using data mining techniques to isolate chemical intrusion in water distribution systems.
    Barros DB; Cardoso SM; Oliveira E; Brentan B; Ribeiro L
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Feb; 194(3):203. PubMed ID: 35182211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Network hydraulics inclusion in water quality event detection using multiple sensor stations data.
    Oliker N; Ostfeld A
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():47-58. PubMed ID: 25996752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.