226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3309521)
1. The Baby Fae case.
Hubbard LL
Med Law; 1987; 6(5):385-96. PubMed ID: 3309521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Baby Fae: the "anything goes" school of human experimentation.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Feb; 15(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 3884551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The NIH report of its review of the Baby Fae case.
Dommel FW;
IRB; 1986; 8(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. NIH approves the consent for Baby Fae, or does it?
Levine C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):2. PubMed ID: 11643771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human experimentation. Protecting patient autonomy through informed consent.
Tuthill KA
J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):221-50. PubMed ID: 9230568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Transplant of baboon heart conformed to safety rules.
Mathews J
Washington Post; 1985 Mar; ():A4. PubMed ID: 11647786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The subject is Baby Fae.
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Feb; 15(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 3884552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Constraints on experimentation: protecting children to death.
Holder AR
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1988; 6(1):137-56. PubMed ID: 11650241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Law and medical experimentation: of embryos, children and others with limited legal capacity.
Dworkin G
Monash Univ Law Rev; 1987 Dec; 13(4):189-208. PubMed ID: 11659196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitively impaired subjects. American College of Physicians.
Ann Intern Med; 1989 Nov; 111(10):843-8. PubMed ID: 2683918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Lack of scrutiny fueled Baby Fae controversy.
Russell C
Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Innovative therapy. The responsibility of hospitals.
Cowan DH; Bertsch E
J Leg Med; 1984 Jun; 5(2):219-51. PubMed ID: 6611383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Review of legal instruments and codes on medical experimentation with children.
Choudhry S
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(4):560-72. PubMed ID: 7858755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Baby Fae.
Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Federal regulations for fetal research: a case for reform.
Fletcher JC; Ryan KJ
Law Med Health Care; 1987; 15(3):126-38. PubMed ID: 3695575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent and Baby Fae.
Knoll E; Lundberg GD
JAMA; 1985 Dec; 254(23):3359-60. PubMed ID: 3906161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Baby Fae: the ethics of medical adventurism.
Preston TA
Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():D7. PubMed ID: 11647783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Made in the U.S.A.: legal and ethical issues in artificial heart experimentation.
Annas GJ
Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):164-71. PubMed ID: 3645227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The using of Baby Fae.
Krauthammer C
Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
