296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33095408)
1. Pembrolizumab vs the EXTREME Regimen in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Lang Y; Dong D; Wu B
Clin Drug Investig; 2020 Dec; 40(12):1137-1146. PubMed ID: 33095408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the United States.
Borse RH; Ramakrishnan K; Gandhi J; Dhankhar P; Chirovsky D
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):954-965. PubMed ID: 35765888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nivolumab vs Pembrolizumab for Treatment of US Patients With Platinum-Refractory Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Pei R; Shi Y; Lv S; Dai T; Zhang F; Liu S; Wu B
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e218065. PubMed ID: 33956130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A cost-effectiveness analysis from Chinese perspective.
Zhou K; Li Y; Liao W; Zhang M; Bai L; Li Q
Oral Oncol; 2020 Aug; 107():104754. PubMed ID: 32428689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy versus cetuximab plus chemotherapy to treat recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An updated KEYNOTE-048 based cost-effectiveness analysis.
She L; Tian K; Han J; Zuo W; Wang Z; Zhang N
Oral Oncol; 2022 Jun; 129():105871. PubMed ID: 35483156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Regimens for the First-Line Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Argentina.
Wurcel V; Chirovsky D; Borse R; Altuna JI; Carabajal F; Gandhi J
Adv Ther; 2021 May; 38(5):2613-2630. PubMed ID: 33855690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.
Burtness B; Harrington KJ; Greil R; Soulières D; Tahara M; de Castro G; Psyrri A; Basté N; Neupane P; Bratland Å; Fuereder T; Hughes BGM; Mesía R; Ngamphaiboon N; Rordorf T; Wan Ishak WZ; Hong RL; González Mendoza R; Roy A; Zhang Y; Gumuscu B; Cheng JD; Jin F; Rischin D;
Lancet; 2019 Nov; 394(10212):1915-1928. PubMed ID: 31679945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in China: an economic analysis based on a randomised, open-label, phase III trial.
Xin W; Ding H; Fang Q; Zheng X; Tong Y; Xu G; Yang G
BMJ Open; 2020 Dec; 10(12):e038867. PubMed ID: 33371020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cetuximab Plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Lang Y; Dong D
Cancer Manag Res; 2020; 12():11383-11390. PubMed ID: 33204154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC that expresses high levels of PD-L1 in Switzerland.
Bhadhuri A; Insinga R; Guggisberg P; Panje C; Schwenkglenks M
Swiss Med Wkly; 2019 Dec; 149():w20170. PubMed ID: 31880807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Aziz MIA; Tan LE; Tan WHG; Toh CK; Loke LPY; Pearce F; Ng K
J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):952-960. PubMed ID: 32462958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab for treatment of US patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.
Shi Y; Chen J; Shi B; Liu A
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 164(2):379-385. PubMed ID: 34920886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as Second-line Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Sweden.
Srivastava T; Prabhu VS; Li H; Xu R; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Pellissier JM; Perini RF; de Wit R; Mamtani R
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):663-670. PubMed ID: 31412001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the USA.
Zeng X; Wan X; Peng L; Peng Y; Ma F; Liu Q; Tan C
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e031019. PubMed ID: 31831534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the 1st line treatment of non-squamous NSCLC in the US.
Insinga RP; Vanness DJ; Feliciano JL; Vandormael K; Traore S; Burke T
J Med Econ; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1191-1205. PubMed ID: 30188231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus the EXTREME regimen in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ye D; Liang X; Chen X; Li Y
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6807. PubMed ID: 38514766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Recurrent Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Zargar M; McFarlane T; Chan KKW; Wong WWL
Oncologist; 2018 Feb; 23(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 29021380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic evaluation of sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for the treatment of first-line advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC.
Chen P; Wang X; Zhu S; Li H; Rui M; Wang Y; Sun H; Ma A
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():956792. PubMed ID: 36016894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy and chemotherapy in the non-small-cell lung cancer with different PD-L1 tumor proportion scores.
Zhou K; Jiang C; Li Q
Lung Cancer; 2019 Oct; 136():98-101. PubMed ID: 31476529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer from the perspective of the Chinese health-care system.
Zhu C; Han G; Wu B
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Oct; 23(1):1083. PubMed ID: 37821934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
