132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33097463)
1. Colposcopic endocervical brushing cytology appears to be more sensitive than histologic endocervical curettage for detecting endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Zou T; Dave S; Adler RN; Manning MJ; Scott MP; Strock C; Kandil D; Cosar E; Fischer AH
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 33097463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cytology and curetting diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Bruehl FK; Dyhdalo KS; Hou Y; Clapacs E; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):556-562. PubMed ID: 32624383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ-from Papanicolaou test to hysterectomy: a series of 74 cases.
Lashmanova N; Braun A; Cheng L; Gattuso P; Yan L
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2022; 11(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 34509373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing visual inspection with acetic acid plus random cervical biopsy plus endocervical curettage to colposcopic directed biopsy plus endocervical curettage in detecting cervical lesions in low-resource settings.
Puntachai P; Darojn D; Chumworathayi B; Chaousriku W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2665-8. PubMed ID: 22320971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endocervical curettage in evaluating abnormal cervical cytology.
Moniak CW; Kutzner S; Adam E; Harden J; Kaufman RH
J Reprod Med; 2000 Apr; 45(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 10804483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective analysis of the utility of endocervical curettage in screening population.
Song Y; Zhao YQ; Li L; Pan QJ; Li N; Zhao FH; Chen W; Zhang X; Qiao YL
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(30):50141-50147. PubMed ID: 28404931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix be predicted before cervical conization?
Kietpeerakool C; Srisomboon J; Prompittayarat W; Kanjanavaha P; Peuwsai R; Dheerakul C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(4):522-4. PubMed ID: 17250421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of Endocervical Curettage in the Diagnosis of High-grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer in Selected Patients.
Akladios C; Lecointre L; Baulon E; Thoma V; Averous G; Fender M; Lefebvre F; Baldauf JJ
Anticancer Res; 2015 Jul; 35(7):4183-9. PubMed ID: 26124376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. To ECC or not to ECC: the question remains.
Driggers RW; Zahn CM
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):583-97; viii. PubMed ID: 19061818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens.
Kumar N; Bongiovanni M; Molliet MJ; Pelte MF; Egger JF; Pache JC
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 18522633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of endocervical curettage and endocervical brushing.
Klam S; Arseneau J; Mansour N; Franco E; Ferenczy A
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jul; 96(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 10862849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of two endocervical sampling method: randomized controlled trial.
Goksedef BP; Api M; Kaya O; Gorgen H; Tarlaci A; Cetin A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 22948805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colposcopy Standards: Guidelines for Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy.
Massad LS; Perkins RB; Naresh A; Nelson EL; Spiryda L; Gecsi KS; Mulhem E; Kostas-Polston E; Zou T; Giles TL; Wentzensen N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2023 Jan; 27(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 36222824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endocervical curettage when colposcopic examination is satisfactory and normal.
Williams DL; Dietrich C; McBroom J
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):801-3. PubMed ID: 10831970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia.
Ullal A; Roberts M; Bulmer JN; Mathers ME; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 18557985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical significance of endocervical curettage (ECC) in predicting neoplastic lesions of the cervix].
Toki T; Fujii S; Yajima A
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Mar; 46(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8133138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
