141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33098284)
1. Diagnostic efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in differentiation of malignant intra-axial brain tumors.
Eyüboğlu İ; Çakir İM; Aslan S; Sari A
Turk J Med Sci; 2021 Feb; 51(1):256-267. PubMed ID: 33098284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema.
Server A; Kulle B; Maehlen J; Josefsen R; Schellhorn T; Kumar T; Langberg CW; Nakstad PH
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 19449234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases.
Caravan I; Ciortea CA; Contis A; Lebovici A
Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):599-605. PubMed ID: 28835111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evidence-based approach to assess the accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging for the grading of brain tumors.
Li WF; Niu C; Shakir TM; Chen T; Zhang M; Wang Z
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(45):e13217. PubMed ID: 30407363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apparent diffusion coefficient maps obtained from high b value diffusion-weighted imaging in the preoperative evaluation of gliomas at 3T: comparison with standard b value diffusion-weighted imaging.
Zeng Q; Dong F; Shi F; Ling C; Jiang B; Zhang J
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5309-5315. PubMed ID: 28639047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a high b-value for diffusion weighted imaging of peritumoral regions to differentiate high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases.
Han C; Huang S; Guo J; Zhuang X; Han H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25223489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Voxel-based clustered imaging by multiparameter diffusion tensor images for glioma grading.
Inano R; Oishi N; Kunieda T; Arakawa Y; Yamao Y; Shibata S; Kikuchi T; Fukuyama H; Miyamoto S
Neuroimage Clin; 2014; 5():396-407. PubMed ID: 25180159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The diagnostic value of high-frequency power-based diffusion-weighted imaging in prediction of neuroepithelial tumour grading.
Chen Z; Zhou P; Lv B; Liu M; Wang Y; Wang Y; Lou X; Gui Q; He H; Ma L
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5056-5063. PubMed ID: 28608161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between ultra-high and conventional mono b-value DWI for preoperative glioma grading.
Hu YC; Yan LF; Sun Q; Liu ZC; Wang SM; Han Y; Tian Q; Sun YZ; Zheng DD; Wang W; Cui GB
Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(23):37884-37895. PubMed ID: 28039453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging for preo- perative glioma grading.
Duy Hung N; Minh Duc N; Van Anh NT; Thanh Dung L; He DV
Clin Ter; 2021 Jul; 172(4):315-321. PubMed ID: 34247214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Grading Gliomas Capability: Comparison between Visual Assessment and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Value Measurement on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI).
Phuttharak W; Thammaroj J; Wara-Asawapati S; Panpeng K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Feb; 21(2):385-390. PubMed ID: 32102515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion weighted imaging in the evaluation of gliomas response after treatment.
Lotumolo A; Caivano R; Rabasco P; Iannelli G; Villonio A; D' Antuono F; Gioioso M; Zandolino A; Macarini L; Guglielmi G; Cammarota A
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2597-604. PubMed ID: 26391231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FET PET in newly diagnosed cerebral lesions suggestive of glioma.
Rapp M; Heinzel A; Galldiks N; Stoffels G; Felsberg J; Ewelt C; Sabel M; Steiger HJ; Reifenberger G; Beez T; Coenen HH; Floeth FW; Langen KJ
J Nucl Med; 2013 Feb; 54(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 23232275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphomas from high-grade gliomas by rCBV and percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging.
Xing Z; You RX; Li J; Liu Y; Cao DR
Clin Neuroradiol; 2014 Dec; 24(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 23994941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Grading diffuse gliomas without intense contrast enhancement by amide proton transfer MR imaging: comparisons with diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging.
Togao O; Hiwatashi A; Yamashita K; Kikuchi K; Keupp J; Yoshimoto K; Kuga D; Yoneyama M; Suzuki SO; Iwaki T; Takahashi M; Iihara K; Honda H
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):578-588. PubMed ID: 27003139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grading of Glioma: combined diagnostic value of amide proton transfer weighted, arterial spin labeling and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Kang XW; Xi YB; Liu TT; Wang N; Zhu YQ; Wang XR; Guo F
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 May; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 32408867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusional kurtosis imaging for differentiating between high-grade glioma and primary central nervous system lymphoma.
Pang H; Ren Y; Dang X; Feng X; Yao Z; Wu J; Yao C; Di N; Ghinda DC; Zhang Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 26588793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined application of MRS and DWI can effectively predict cell proliferation and assess the grade of glioma: A prospective study.
Hu X; Xue M; Sun S; Zou Y; Li J; Wang X; Liu X; Ma H
J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 83():56-63. PubMed ID: 33334663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion kurtosis imaging differs between primary central nervous system lymphoma and high-grade glioma and is correlated with the diverse nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio: a histopathologic, biopsy-based study.
Haopeng P; Xuefei D; Yan R; Zhenwei Y; Wei H; Ziyin W; Qungang S; Chaojie L; Linyan Y; Zhongmin W; Xiaoyuan F
Eur Radiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):2125-2137. PubMed ID: 31858206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
