These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33098560)
1. False-positive enterococci counts in seawater with the IDEXX Enterolert-E most probable number technique caused by Bacillus licheniformis. Peperzak L; van Bleijswijk J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(9):10654-10660. PubMed ID: 33098560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Enterolert for enumeration of enterococci in recreational waters. Budnick GE; Howard RT; Mayo DR Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 Oct; 62(10):3881-4. PubMed ID: 8837446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of Paenibacillus on IDEXX Enterolert results from freshwater stream environments. Graves GM; Tanner RS; Vogel JR; De León KB; Walls AW Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(39):91074-91083. PubMed ID: 37466837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of ddPCR for detection of Enterococcus spp. in coastal water quality monitoring. Crain C; Kezer K; Steele S; Owiti J; Rao S; Victorio M; Austin B; Volner A; Draper W; Griffith J; Steele J; Seifert M J Microbiol Methods; 2021 May; 184():106206. PubMed ID: 33766607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Holding-time and method comparisons for the analysis of fecal-indicator bacteria in groundwater. Bushon RN; Brady AM; Lindsey BD Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Nov; 187(11):672. PubMed ID: 26439125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enterococci as indicators of Lake Michigan recreational water quality: comparison of two methodologies and their impacts on public health regulatory events. Kinzelman J; Ng C; Jackson E; Gradus S; Bagley R Appl Environ Microbiol; 2003 Jan; 69(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 12513981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cultivation-independent analysis of bacteria in IDEXX Quanti-Tray/2000 fecal indicator assays. Sercu B; Van De Werfhorst LC; Murray JL; Holden PA Appl Environ Microbiol; 2011 Jan; 77(2):627-33. PubMed ID: 21097584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of glucosidase agar for the confirmation of water-borne Enterococcus. Adcock PW; Saint CP Water Res; 2001 Dec; 35(17):4243-6. PubMed ID: 11791856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources. Rothenheber D; Jones S Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 30006393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches. Cloutier DD; McLellan SL Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(4):. PubMed ID: 27940538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suitability of the traditional microbial indicators and their enumerating methods in the assessment of fecal pollution of subtropical freshwater environments. Chao KK; Chao CC; Chao WL J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2003 Dec; 36(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 14723262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative inactivation of faecal indicator bacteria and sewage markers in freshwater and seawater microcosms. Ahmed W; Gyawali P; Sidhu JP; Toze S Lett Appl Microbiol; 2014 Sep; 59(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 24834814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occurrence of Vibrio species, beta-lactam resistant Vibrio species, and indicator bacteria in ballast and port waters of a tropical harbor. Ng C; Goh SG; Saeidi N; Gerhard WA; Gunsch CK; Gin KYH Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 610-611():651-656. PubMed ID: 28822933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the occurrence and survival of fecal indicator bacteria in recreational sand between urban beach, playground and sandbox settings in Toronto, Ontario. Staley ZR; Robinson C; Edge TA Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 541():520-527. PubMed ID: 26432162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacteriological water quality along the Tijuana-Ensenada, Baja California, México shoreline. Orozco-Borbón MV; Rico-Mora R; Weisberg SB; Noble RT; Dorsey JH; Leecaster MK; McGee CD Mar Pollut Bull; 2006 Oct; 52(10):1190-6. PubMed ID: 16678215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Techniques for Measuring Microbial Hazards in Bathing Waters: A Comparative Study. Schang C; Henry R; Kolotelo PA; Prosser T; Crosbie N; Grant T; Cottam D; O'Brien P; Coutts S; Deletic A; McCarthy DT PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155848. PubMed ID: 27213772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of sodium azide concentration on the recovery of enterococci from water. Fricker CR; Eldred BJ J Water Health; 2014 Jun; 12(2):264-8. PubMed ID: 24937220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance and specificity of the covalently linked immunomagnetic separation-ATP method for rapid detection and enumeration of enterococci in coastal environments. Zimmer-Faust AG; Thulsiraj V; Ferguson D; Jay JA Appl Environ Microbiol; 2014 May; 80(9):2705-14. PubMed ID: 24561583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying environmental reservoirs of fecal indicator bacteria associated with sediment and submerged aquatic vegetation. Badgley BD; Thomas FI; Harwood VJ Environ Microbiol; 2011 Apr; 13(4):932-42. PubMed ID: 21208357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential decay and prediction of persistence of Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli culturable cells and molecular markers in freshwater and seawater environments. Sagarduy M; Courtois S; Del Campo A; Garmendia JM; Petrau A Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2019 May; 222(4):695-704. PubMed ID: 31097324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]