131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33099252)
1. Cochlear microphonic latency predicts outer hair cell function in animal models and clinical populations.
Bester C; Weder S; Collins A; Dragovic A; Brody K; Hampson A; O'Leary S
Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 398():108094. PubMed ID: 33099252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.
Reiss LA; Stark G; Nguyen-Huynh AT; Spear KA; Zhang H; Tanaka C; Li H
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():163-74. PubMed ID: 26087114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Band-Limited Chirp-Evoked Compound Action Potential in Guinea Pig: Comprehensive Neural Measure for Cochlear Implantation Monitoring.
Adel Y; Tillein J; Petzold H; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):142-162. PubMed ID: 32665481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrophysiological Evidence of the Basilar-Membrane Travelling Wave and Frequency Place Coding of Sound in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Campbell L; Bester C; Iseli C; Sly D; Dragovic A; Gummer AW; O'Leary S
Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):180-189. PubMed ID: 29084395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.
Kim JS; Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrocochleography triggered intervention successfully preserves residual hearing during cochlear implantation: Results of a randomised clinical trial.
Bester C; Collins A; Razmovski T; Weder S; Briggs RJ; Wei B; Zakaria AF; Gerard JM; Mitchell-Innes A; Tykocinski M; Kennedy R; Iseli C; Dahm M; Ellul S; O'Leary S
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108353. PubMed ID: 34600798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterizing Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
Bester CW; Campbell L; Dragovic A; Collins A; O'Leary SJ
Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():141. PubMed ID: 28386212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochlear microphonic potential recorded by transtympanic electrocochleography in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.
Santarelli R; Scimemi P; Dal Monte E; Arslan E
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2006 Apr; 26(2):78-95. PubMed ID: 16886850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Response Patterns During Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Preservation.
Giardina CK; Brown KD; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Hutson KA; Pillsbury HC; Fitzpatrick DC
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):833-848. PubMed ID: 30335669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brief report: the cochlear microphonic as an indication of outer hair cell function.
Withnell RH
Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 11271978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrocochleographic Patterns Predicting Increased Impedances and Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation.
Bester C; Dalbert A; Collins A; Razmovski T; Gerard JM; O'Leary S
Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):710-720. PubMed ID: 36550618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model of Hybrid cochlear implants.
Tanaka C; Nguyen-Huynh A; Loera K; Stark G; Reiss L
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():82-93. PubMed ID: 25128626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses.
Sato M; Baumhoff P; Kral A
J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 26740649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of sustained release dexamethasone hydrogels in hearing preservation cochlear implantation.
Honeder C; Zhu C; Schöpper H; Gausterer JC; Walter M; Landegger LD; Saidov N; Riss D; Plasenzotti R; Gabor F; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():43-49. PubMed ID: 27519654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hearing preservation at low frequencies by insulin-like growth factor 1 in a guinea pig model of cochlear implantation.
Yamahara K; Nishimura K; Ogita H; Ito J; Nakagawa T; Furuta I; Kita T; Omori K; Yamamoto N
Hear Res; 2018 Oct; 368():92-108. PubMed ID: 30006113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relations between cochlear histopathology and hearing loss in experimental cochlear implantation.
O'Leary SJ; Monksfield P; Kel G; Connolly T; Souter MA; Chang A; Marovic P; O'Leary JS; Richardson R; Eastwood H
Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():27-35. PubMed ID: 23396095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audibility, speech perception and processing of temporal cues in ribbon synaptic disorders due to OTOF mutations.
Santarelli R; del Castillo I; Cama E; Scimemi P; Starr A
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt B):200-12. PubMed ID: 26188103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neuroprotective Effect of Near-Infrared Light in an Animal Model of CI Surgery.
Strübing I; Gröschel M; Schwitzer S; Ernst A; Fröhlich F; Jiang D; Boyle P; Basta D
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 33238272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of intracochlear damage with cochlear implantation in a gerbil model of hearing loss.
Choudhury B; Adunka OF; Demason CE; Ahmad FI; Buchman CA; Fitzpatrick DC
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1370-8. PubMed ID: 21921858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
