These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

778 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33099544)

  • 81. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Diagnostic ability and factors affecting accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions: Japanese large single center experience.
    Haba S; Yamao K; Bhatia V; Mizuno N; Hara K; Hijioka S; Imaoka H; Niwa Y; Tajika M; Kondo S; Tanaka T; Shimizu Y; Yatabe Y; Hosoda W; Kawakami H; Sakamoto N
    J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 23090002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
    El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Larghi A; Iglesias-Garcia J; Poley JW; Monges G; Petrone MC; Rindi G; Abdulkader I; Arcidiacono PG; Costamagna G; Biermann K; Bories E; Doglioni C; Dominguez-Muñoz JE; Hassan C; Bruno M; Giovannini M
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3733-8. PubMed ID: 23644834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration versus endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy in sampling pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis.
    Wang J; Zhao S; Chen Y; Jia R; Zhang X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(28):e7452. PubMed ID: 28700483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Factors influencing diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic and biliary tumors.
    Del Vecchio Blanco G; Palmieri G; Giannarelli D; Formica V; Portarena I; Nardecchia A; Troncone E; Benassi M; Giudice E; Anselmo A; Tisone G; Roselli M; Monteleone G; Paoluzi OA
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2021 Apr; 56(4):498-504. PubMed ID: 33539716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Comparative diagnostic yield of different endoscopic techniques for tissue sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Fugazza A; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Colombo M; Ramai D; Mangiavillano B; Chandan S; Gkolfakis P; Mohan B; Hassan C; Repici A
    Endoscopy; 2024 Jan; 56(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 37591258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.
    Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Factors affecting cytological results of endoscopic ultrasound guided-fine needle aspiration during learning.
    Lai JH; Lin HH; Lin CC
    Diagn Pathol; 2020 Feb; 15(1):17. PubMed ID: 32061261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy using a Franseen needle design: Initial assessment.
    Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Hasan MK; Navaneethan U; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2017 May; 29(3):338-346. PubMed ID: 27878861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Adequacy evaluation and use of pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens for next-generation sequencing acquired by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and FNB.
    Gan Q; Roy-Chowdhuri S; Duose DY; Stewart JM; Coronel E; Bhutani MS; Lee JH; Weston B; Ge PS; Ross WA; Maitra A
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Apr; 130(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 34905283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration.
    Mohamadnejad M; Mullady D; Early DS; Collins B; Marshall C; Sams S; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Nawaz S; Ulusarac O; Hollander T; Wilson RH; Simon VC; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Brauer BC; Gaddam S; Azar RR; Komanduri S; Shah R; Das A; Edmundowicz S; Muthusamy VR; Rastogi A; Wani S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jul; 15(7):1071-1078.e2. PubMed ID: 28025154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Relationship of pancreatic mass size and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.
    Siddiqui AA; Brown LJ; Hong SK; Draganova-Tacheva RA; Korenblit J; Loren DE; Kowalski TE; Solomides C
    Dig Dis Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(11):3370-5. PubMed ID: 21688127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Diagnostic yield of small histological cores obtained with a new EUS-guided fine needle biopsy system.
    Ishikawa T; Mohamed R; Heitman SJ; Turbide C; Kumar PR; Goto H; Hirooka Y; Belletrutti PJ
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5143-5149. PubMed ID: 28493167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Effectiveness of EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy versus EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Kuraoka N; Hashimoto S; Matsui S; Terai S
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34071881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. An exclusive fine-needle biopsy approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance: a prospective cohort study.
    Temnykh LM; Rahal MA; Zia Z; Al-Haddad MA
    Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2020 Oct; 8(5):349-354. PubMed ID: 33163189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Interobserver Agreement among Cytopathologists in False-Negative Cases by Cytological Diagnosis with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Shi C; Li S; Chen L; Hong J; Bao J; Xu Z; Xu J; Mei Q
    Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(3):240-247. PubMed ID: 37263259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
    van Riet PA; Erler NS; Bruno MJ; Cahen DL
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 32583392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
    Itonaga M; Yasukawa S; Shimokawa T; Takenaka M; Fukutake N; Ogura T; Sakagami J; Shiomi H; Okura Y; Inatomi O; Matsumoto H; Kurita A; Suzuki A; Tanaka K; Kitano M
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.