These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33099740)

  • 41. Assessing the performance of sustainable entrepreneurship and environmental corporate social responsibility: revisited environmental nexus from business firms.
    Ahmad Z; Chao L; Chao W; Iqbal W; Muhammad S; Ahmed S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(15):21426-21439. PubMed ID: 34757559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: a moderate role of fintech technology.
    Liu Y; Saleem S; Shabbir R; Shabbir MS; Irshad A; Khan S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(16):20174-20187. PubMed ID: 33410049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. "Does a Good Company Reduce the Unhealthy Behavior of Its Members?": The Mediating Effect of Organizational Identification and the Moderating Effect of Moral Identity.
    Kim BJ; Choi SY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34209850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Corporate social responsibility, internal control, and firm financial performance.
    Zhang L; Su W
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():977996. PubMed ID: 36660285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Scrutinizing Social Identity Theory in Corporate Social Responsibility: An Experimental Investigation.
    Paruzel A; Danel M; Maier GW
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():580620. PubMed ID: 33381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A novel IFN-CSM-CoCoSo approach for multiple-attribute group decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy sets: An application in assessing corporate social responsibility performance.
    Nie J
    Heliyon; 2024 Apr; 10(7):e29207. PubMed ID: 38623234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Modeling the influencing factors of electronic word-of-mouth about CSR on social networking sites.
    Hai Ming L; Gang L; Hua H; Waqas M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(44):66204-66221. PubMed ID: 35501440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Corporate social responsibility and access to policy élites: an analysis of tobacco industry documents.
    Fooks GJ; Gilmore AB; Smith KE; Collin J; Holden C; Lee K
    PLoS Med; 2011 Aug; 8(8):e1001076. PubMed ID: 21886485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Compatibility and Authenticity on Brand Trust and Corporate Sustainability Management: For Korean Cosmetics Companies.
    Lee SH; Jeong GY
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():895823. PubMed ID: 35645870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Scientific evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility. A bibliometric analysis with mapping analysis tools.
    Escamilla-Solano S; Paule-Vianez J; Plaza-Casado P; Díaz-Iglesias S
    An Acad Bras Cienc; 2023; 95(1):e20210215. PubMed ID: 36946802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Does more voluntary environmental information disclosure cut down the cost of equity: heavy pollution industries in China.
    Wendai L; Jing F; Bin L
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(42):62913-62940. PubMed ID: 35840829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance and Corporate Performance: Evidence from China in the Perspective of Green Development.
    Yang R; Zhang R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A Perceptual Approach to the Impact of CSR on Organizational Financial Performance.
    Cazacu M; Dumitriu S; Georgescu I; Berceanu D; Simion D; Vărzaru AA; Bocean CG
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 37232596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Performance Implication of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Role of Employee's Prosocial Motivation.
    Kim MJ; Kim BJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 33803584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparation of differences in the performance of corporate social responsibility between Chinese and American pharmaceutical enterprises-based on corporate social responsibility report.
    Xu H; Zhang M; Chu S
    Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1116466. PubMed ID: 37284320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Feedback on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance.
    Lee JE; Yang YS
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():893193. PubMed ID: 35664210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
    Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Moderating role of financial ratios in corporate social responsibility disclosure and firm value.
    Naseem MA; Lin J; Rehman RU; Ahmad MI; Ali R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215430. PubMed ID: 30998740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Factors Affecting the Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Health Technology Industry in Greece.
    Liopa M; Geitona M; Latsou D
    Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e39946. PubMed ID: 37409209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility and Workplace Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Person-Organization Fit and Organizational Identification's Sequential Mediation.
    Duarte AP; Mouro C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(16):. PubMed ID: 36011990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.