These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33100508)

  • 1. Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension.
    Brothers T; Kuperberg GR
    J Mem Lang; 2021 Feb; 116():. PubMed ID: 33100508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Large-scale evidence for logarithmic effects of word predictability on reading time.
    Shain C; Meister C; Pimentel T; Cotterell R; Levy R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(10):e2307876121. PubMed ID: 38422017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.
    Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic.
    Smith NJ; Levy R
    Cognition; 2013 Sep; 128(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 23747651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prior Context and Individual Alpha Frequency Influence Predictive Processing during Language Comprehension.
    Jano S; Cross Z; Chatburn A; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 May; ():1-39. PubMed ID: 38820550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discourse coherence modulates use of predictive processing during sentence comprehension.
    Carter GA; Hoffman P
    Cognition; 2024 Jan; 242():105637. PubMed ID: 37857052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability.
    Hofmann MJ; Remus S; Biemann C; Radach R; Kuchinke L
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():730570. PubMed ID: 35187472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating information-theoretic measures of word prediction in naturalistic sentence reading.
    Aurnhammer C; Frank SL
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107198. PubMed ID: 31553896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic similarity, predictability, and models of sentence processing.
    Roland D; Yun H; Koenig JP; Mauner G
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 22197059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linguistic networks associated with lexical, semantic and syntactic predictability in reading: A fixation-related fMRI study.
    Carter BT; Foster B; Muncy NM; Luke SG
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():224-240. PubMed ID: 30654173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.
    Schotter ER; Bicknell K; Howard I; Levy R; Rayner K
    Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 24434024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Structural Parsers and Neural Language Models as Surprisal Estimators.
    Oh BD; Clark C; Schuler W
    Front Artif Intell; 2022; 5():777963. PubMed ID: 35310956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word's Predictability Can Modulate Semantic Preview Effect in High-Constraint Sentences.
    Xu L; Liu S; Wang S; Sun D; Li N
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():849351. PubMed ID: 35401306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lexical Frequency and Sentence Context Influence the Brain's Response to Single Words.
    Huizeling E; Arana S; Hagoort P; Schoffelen JM
    Neurobiol Lang (Camb); 2022; 3(1):149-179. PubMed ID: 37215333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphosyntactic but not lexical corpus-based probabilities can substitute for cloze probabilities in reading experiments.
    Lopukhina A; Lopukhin K; Laurinavichyute A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0246133. PubMed ID: 33508029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurobehavioral Correlates of Surprisal in Language Comprehension: A Neurocomputational Model.
    Brouwer H; Delogu F; Venhuizen NJ; Crocker MW
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():615538. PubMed ID: 33643143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of decay and lexical uncertainty on processing long-distance dependencies in reading.
    Stone K; von der Malsburg T; Vasishth S
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10438. PubMed ID: 33362963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Encouraging prediction during production facilitates subsequent comprehension: Evidence from interleaved object naming in sentence context and sentence reading.
    Hintz F; Meyer AS; Huettig F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 26652170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Locality and expectation effects in Hindi preverbal constituent ordering.
    Ranjan S; Rajkumar R; Agarwal S
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():104959. PubMed ID: 35091261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of language production in making predictions during comprehension.
    Lelonkiewicz JR; Rabagliati H; Pickering MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Dec; 74(12):2193-2209. PubMed ID: 34120522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.