These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33101108)
1. Estimating CDMs Using the Slice-Within-Gibbs Sampler. Xu X; de la Torre J; Zhang J; Guo J; Shi N Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2260. PubMed ID: 33101108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler. da Silva MA; de Oliveira ESB; von Davier AA; Bazán JL Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):352-368. PubMed ID: 29194715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gibbs-Slice Sampling Algorithm for Estimating the Four-Parameter Logistic Model. Zhang J; Lu J; Du H; Zhang Z Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2121. PubMed ID: 33041882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Model With Pólya-Gamma Gibbs Sampling. Zhang Z; Zhang J; Lu J; Tao J Front Psychol; 2020; 11():384. PubMed ID: 32210894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and No-U-Turn Sampler for estimating genetic parameters and breeding values. Nishio M; Arakawa A Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Dec; 51(1):73. PubMed ID: 31823719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Novel and Highly Effective Bayesian Sampling Algorithm Based on the Auxiliary Variables to Estimate the Testlet Effect Models. Lu J; Zhang J; Zhang Z; Xu B; Tao J Front Psychol; 2021; 12():509575. PubMed ID: 34456774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A fast and efficient Gibbs sampler for BayesB in whole-genome analyses. Cheng H; Qu L; Garrick DJ; Fernando RL Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():80. PubMed ID: 26467850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Markov chain Monte Carlo Gibbs sampler approach for estimating haplotype frequencies among multiple malaria infected human blood samples. Ken-Dror G; Sharma P Malar J; 2021 Jul; 20(1):311. PubMed ID: 34246273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sampling phylogenetic tree space with the generalized Gibbs sampler. Keith JM; Adams P; Ragan MA; Bryant D Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Mar; 34(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 15683921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Gibbs Sampler for Learning DAGs. Goudie RJ; Mukherjee S J Mach Learn Res; 2016 Apr; 17(30):1-39. PubMed ID: 28331463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifiability of Hidden Markov Models for Learning Trajectories in Cognitive Diagnosis. Liu Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y Psychometrika; 2023 Jun; 88(2):361-386. PubMed ID: 36797538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian analysis of longitudinal binary responses based on the multivariate probit model: A comparison of five methods. Lu K; Chen F Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2261-2286. PubMed ID: 36128906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Semiparametric Bayesian Approach to Heterogeneous Spatial Autoregressive Models. Liu T; Xu D; Ke S Entropy (Basel); 2024 Jun; 26(6):. PubMed ID: 38920507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequential Gibbs Sampling Algorithm for Cognitive Diagnosis Models with Many Attributes. Wang J; Shi N; Zhang X; Xu G Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(5):840-858. PubMed ID: 33755507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying uncertainty in geoacoustic inversion. I. A fast Gibbs sampler approach. Dosso SE J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 11831788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multilevel Modeling of Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment: The Multilevel DINA Example. Wang WC; Qiu XL Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jan; 43(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 30573933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian Computational Methods for Sampling from the Posterior Distribution of a Bivariate Survival Model, Based on AMH Copula in the Presence of Right-Censored Data. Saraiva EF; Suzuki AK; Milan LA Entropy (Basel); 2018 Aug; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 33265731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Improved Strategy for Bayesian Estimation of the Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model. Culpepper SA; Hudson A Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Mar; 42(2):99-115. PubMed ID: 29881115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix. Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian analysis for finite mixture in non-recursive non-linear structural equation models. Li Y; Wang HZ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):361-77. PubMed ID: 19719904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]