These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33101108)

  • 21. The Sufficient and Necessary Condition for the Identifiability and Estimability of the DINA Model.
    Gu Y; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):468-483. PubMed ID: 29728918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An Auxiliary Variable Method for Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms in High Dimension.
    Marnissi Y; Chouzenoux E; Benazza-Benyahia A; Pesquet JC
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Feb; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 33265201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automated Factor Slice Sampling.
    Tibbits MM; Groendyke C; Haran M; Liechty JC
    J Comput Graph Stat; 2014; 23(2):543-563. PubMed ID: 24955002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gibbs Recursive Sampler: finding transcription factor binding sites.
    Thompson W; Rouchka EC; Lawrence CE
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2003 Jul; 31(13):3580-5. PubMed ID: 12824370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Monte Carlo Metropolis-Hastings algorithm for sampling from distributions with intractable normalizing constants.
    Liang F; Jin IH
    Neural Comput; 2013 Aug; 25(8):2199-234. PubMed ID: 23607562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficient Irreversible Monte Carlo Samplers.
    Faizi F; Deligiannidis G; Rosta E
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Apr; 16(4):2124-2138. PubMed ID: 32097548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improved techniques for sampling complex pedigrees with the Gibbs sampler.
    Abraham KJ; Totir LR; Fernando RL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2007; 39(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 17212946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses.
    Lin M; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):717-740. PubMed ID: 38517594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gibbs ensembles for incompatible dependency networks.
    Chen SH; Ip EH; Wang YJ
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat; 2013; 5(6):478-485. PubMed ID: 27917257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Hamming Ball Sampler.
    Titsias MK; Yau C
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2017; 112(520):1598-1611. PubMed ID: 29456460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bayesian estimation of divergence times from large sequence alignments.
    Guindon S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Aug; 27(8):1768-81. PubMed ID: 20194424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. MCMC methods for putative pollution source problems in environmental epidemiology.
    Lawson AB
    Stat Med; 1995 Nov 15-30; 14(21-22):2473-85. PubMed ID: 8711282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.
    Liu CW; Andersson B; Skrondal A
    Psychometrika; 2020 Jun; 85(2):322-357. PubMed ID: 32632838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. P- and T-wave delineation in ECG signals using a Bayesian approach and a partially collapsed Gibbs sampler.
    Lin C; Mailhes C; Tourneret JY
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Dec; 57(12):2840-9. PubMed ID: 20851787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perfect Sampling of the Posterior in the Hierarchical Pitman-Yor Process.
    Bacallado S; Favaro S; Power S; Trippa L
    Bayesian Anal; 2022 Sep; 17(3):685-709. PubMed ID: 37876627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Markov Chain Monte Carlo Inference of Parametric Dictionaries for Sparse Bayesian Approximations.
    Chaspari T; Tsiartas A; Tsilifis P; Narayanan S
    IEEE Trans Signal Process; 2016 Jun; 64(12):3077-3092. PubMed ID: 28649173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Bayesian model selection approach for identifying differentially expressed transcripts from RNA sequencing data.
    Papastamoulis P; Rattray M
    J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat; 2018 Jan; 67(1):3-23. PubMed ID: 29353941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Behavior of the Gibbs Sampler When Conditional Distributions Are Potentially Incompatible.
    Chen SH; Ip EH
    J Stat Comput Simul; 2015; 85(16):3266-3275. PubMed ID: 26388658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Comparison of Estimation Methods for a Multi-unidimensional Graded Response IRT Model.
    Kuo TC; Sheng Y
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():880. PubMed ID: 27375545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sampling phylogenetic tree space with the generalized Gibbs sampler.
    Keith JM
    Cladistics; 2015 Aug; 31(4):438-440. PubMed ID: 34772263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.