These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33101139)

  • 21. International Comparative Study of Statistics Learning Trajectories Based on PISA Data on Cognitive Diagnostic Models.
    Jia B; Zhu Z; Gao H
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():657858. PubMed ID: 34354630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Identifying Coexisting Skills and Misconceptions.
    Kuo BC; Chen CH; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 May; 42(3):179-191. PubMed ID: 29881120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Optimal Choice of Cognitive Diagnostic Model for Second Language Listening Comprehension Test.
    Dong Y; Ma X; Wang C; Gao X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():608320. PubMed ID: 33935863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantifying the Distorting Effect of Rapid Guessing on Estimates of Coefficient Αlpha.
    Rios JA; Deng J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jan; 46(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 34898746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.
    Li L; An Y; Ren J; Wei X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714568. PubMed ID: 34557134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Longitudinal Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Based on the HMM/ANN Model.
    Wen H; Liu Y; Zhao N
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2145. PubMed ID: 33013545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Procedure for Assessing the Completeness of the Q-Matrices of Cognitively Diagnostic Tests.
    Köhn HF; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):112-132. PubMed ID: 27714544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cognitive Diagnosis for Small Educational Programs: The General Nonparametric Classification Method.
    Chiu CY; Sun Y; Bian Y
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jun; 83(2):355-375. PubMed ID: 29150816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Sequential Process Model for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment With Repeated Attempts.
    Hung SP; Huang HY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):495-511. PubMed ID: 31534286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the Sequential Hierarchical Cognitive Diagnostic Model.
    Zhang X; Wang J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():579018. PubMed ID: 33117245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():621251. PubMed ID: 33569029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. DINA Models for Multiple-Choice Items With Few Parameters: Considering Incorrect Answers.
    Ozaki K
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Sep; 39(6):431-447. PubMed ID: 29881017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data.
    Yigit HD; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jul; 43(5):388-401. PubMed ID: 31235984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficient Models for Cognitive Diagnosis With Continuous and Mixed-Type Latent Variables.
    Hong H; Wang C; Lim YS; Douglas J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jan; 39(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 29880992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Semi-supervised Learning-Based Diagnostic Classification Method Using Artificial Neural Networks.
    Xue K; Bradshaw LP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():618336. PubMed ID: 33551928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.
    de la Torre J; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 25943366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improving Robustness in Q-Matrix Validation Using an Iterative and Dynamic Procedure.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Sep; 44(6):431-446. PubMed ID: 32788815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing Change in Latent Skills Across Time With Longitudinal Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling: An Evaluation of Model Performance.
    Kaya Y; Leite WL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Jun; 77(3):369-388. PubMed ID: 29795918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modeling Not-Reached Items in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments.
    Liang L; Lu J; Zhang J; Shi N
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():889673. PubMed ID: 35769736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.