These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33101152)

  • 1. Commentary: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science.
    Botella J; Suero M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():581910. PubMed ID: 33101152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.
    Head ML; Holman L; Lanfear R; Kahn AT; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2015 Mar; 13(3):e1002106. PubMed ID: 25768323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of
    Stefan AM; Schönbrodt FD
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Feb; 10(2):220346. PubMed ID: 36778954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reanalyzing Head et al. (2015): investigating the robustness of widespread
    Hartgerink CH
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3068. PubMed ID: 28265523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problems in using p-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p-hacking and evidential value.
    Bishop DV; Thompson PA
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1715. PubMed ID: 26925335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. P-Hacking in Orthopaedic Literature: A Twist to the Tail.
    Bin Abd Razak HR; Ang JE; Attal H; Howe TS; Allen JC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(20):e91. PubMed ID: 27869632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. P-Hacking: A Wake-Up Call for the Scientific Community.
    Raj AT; Patil S; Sarode S; Salameh Z
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1813-1814. PubMed ID: 29071570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hacking and Ransomware: Challenges for Institutions Both Large and Small.
    Ritenour ER
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):736-737. PubMed ID: 31967498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Pitfalls in the statistical world].
    Kiese-Himmel C; Plontke SK
    HNO; 2020 Jan; 68(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 31501916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid
    Wicherts JM; Veldkamp CL; Augusteijn HE; Bakker M; van Aert RC; van Assen MA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1832. PubMed ID: 27933012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them).
    Wicherts JM
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Nov; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 29186879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistics Commentary Series: Commentary No. 27: P-Hacking.
    Streiner DL
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):286-288. PubMed ID: 29851710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Reckless Guide to P-values : Local Evidence, Global Errors.
    Lew MJ
    Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2020; 257():223-256. PubMed ID: 31897610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation.
    Olsen J; Mosen J; Voracek M; Kirchler E
    R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Dec; 6(12):190738. PubMed ID: 31903199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research.
    Bruns SB; Ioannidis JP
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149144. PubMed ID: 26886098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria.
    Pettibone L; Vohland K; Ziegler D
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178778. PubMed ID: 28654930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On "the application of science to science itself:" chemistry, instruments, and the scientific labor process.
    Borg G
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2020 Feb; 79():41-56. PubMed ID: 32072925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide.
    Forstmeier W; Wagenmakers EJ; Parker TH
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Nov; 92(4):1941-1968. PubMed ID: 27879038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do-it-yourself biology and electronic waste hacking: A politics of demonstration in precarious times.
    Delgado A; Callén B
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Feb; 26(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 27233296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting?
    Chuard PJC; Vrtílek M; Head ML; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):e3000127. PubMed ID: 30682013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.