These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33103599)

  • 1. Auditory versus visual spatial stimulus-response mappings in tracking and discrete dual task performance: implications for human-machine interface design.
    Tsang SNH; Chan AHS; Pan X; Man SS
    Ergonomics; 2021 Apr; 64(4):485-501. PubMed ID: 33103599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tracking and discrete dual task performance for different visual spatial stimulus-response mappings with focal and ambient vision.
    Tsang SNH; Chan AHS
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():39-49. PubMed ID: 29122199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tracking and discrete dual task performance with different spatial stimulus-response mappings.
    Tsang SN; Chan AH
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(3):368-82. PubMed ID: 25396283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation on the effects of presentation modality for spatial signals on human performance using a dual task paradigm.
    Kang SX; Man SS; Chan AHS
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103898. PubMed ID: 36115134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 26421450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modality-specific effects of mental fatigue in multitasking.
    Mueckstein M; Heinzel S; Granacher U; Brahms M; Rapp MA; Stelzel C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Oct; 230():103766. PubMed ID: 36242924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.
    Stelzel C; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2011 Nov; 75(6):476-90. PubMed ID: 21811837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2346-2363. PubMed ID: 32895726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1546-1562. PubMed ID: 35103924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2011 Nov; 75(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 21858664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 20565224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modality compatibility biases voluntary choice of response modality in task switching.
    Fintor E; Poljac E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):380-388. PubMed ID: 29926170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term pre-exposure to modality mappings: Modality-incompatible single-task exposure reduces modality-specific between-task crosstalk in task-switching.
    Stephan DN; Fintor E; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Apr; 224():103502. PubMed ID: 35131493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
    Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simple auditory and visual interruptions of a continuous visual tracking task: modality effects and time course of interference.
    Nees MA; Sampsell NG
    Ergonomics; 2021 Jul; 64(7):879-890. PubMed ID: 33428536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task switching, modality compatibility, and the supra-modal function of eye movements.
    Stephan DN; Koch I; Hendler J; Huestegge L
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 23047914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Naïve and experienced judgments of stimulus-response compatibility: implications for interface design.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Ergonomics; 2003 Jan; 46(1-3):169-87. PubMed ID: 12554405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-modal re-mapping influences the Simon effect.
    Tagliabue M; Zorzi M; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 11958350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.