These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33103932)

  • 1. A Comparison of Limited-Information Test Statistics for a Response Style MIRT Model.
    Starr J; Falk CF; Monroe SL; Vachon DD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(4):687-702. PubMed ID: 33103932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correcting for Extreme Response Style: Model Choice Matters.
    Schoenmakers M; Tijmstra J; Vermunt J; Bolsinova M
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Feb; 84(1):145-170. PubMed ID: 38250509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of Response Styles Using the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model: A Tutorial and Comparison With Sum Scores.
    Falk CF; Ju U
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():72. PubMed ID: 32116902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extreme Response Style: A Simulation Study Comparison of Three Multidimensional Item Response Models.
    Leventhal BC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 43(4):322-335. PubMed ID: 31156283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of Three IRT Models for Measuring and Controlling Extreme and Midpoint Response Styles.
    Zhang Y; Wang Y
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():271. PubMed ID: 32153477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the Behaviors of
    Xu J; Paek I; Xia Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Nov; 41(8):632-644. PubMed ID: 29881108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring Response Style Stability Across Constructs With Item Response Trees.
    Ames AJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Apr; 82(2):281-306. PubMed ID: 35185160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A flexible full-information approach to the modeling of response styles.
    Falk CF; Cai L
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):328-47. PubMed ID: 26641273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the Source of Misfit in Item Response Theory Models.
    Liu Y; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2014; 49(4):354-71. PubMed ID: 26765803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian Dimensionality Assessment for the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model.
    Revuelta J; Ximénez C
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():961. PubMed ID: 28670291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement.
    Adams DJ; Bolt DM; Deng S; Smith SS; Baker TB
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):466-485. PubMed ID: 30919943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models.
    Cai L; Hansen M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):245-76. PubMed ID: 22642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Simulation Study on Methods of Correcting for the Effects of Extreme Response Style.
    Wetzel E; Böhnke JR; Rose N
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Apr; 76(2):304-324. PubMed ID: 29795867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Explaining Variability in Response Style Traits: A Covariate-Adjusted IRTree.
    Ames AJ; Myers AJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Aug; 81(4):756-780. PubMed ID: 34267399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years.
    Wetzel E; Lüdtke O; Zettler I; Böhnke JR
    Assessment; 2016 Jun; 23(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 25986062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robustness of Projective IRT to Misspecification of the Underlying Multidimensional Model.
    Strachan T; Ip E; Fu Y; Ackerman T; Chen SH; Willse J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jul; 44(5):362-375. PubMed ID: 32879536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring Rubric-Related Multidimensionality in Polytomously Scored Test Items.
    Bolt DM; Adams DJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 May; 41(3):163-177. PubMed ID: 29881086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
    Kutscher T; Eid M; Crayen C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2494. PubMed ID: 31798490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.
    Huang HY
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1706. PubMed ID: 27853444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.