These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33104379)

  • 41. Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.
    Gilbert RA; Davis MH; Gaskell MG; Rodd JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1533-1561. PubMed ID: 29389181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Qualitatively different semantic representations for abstract and concrete words: further evidence from the semantic reading errors of deep dyslexic patients.
    Crutch SJ
    Neurocase; 2006 Apr; 12(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16714241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Not just form, not just meaning: Words with consistent form-meaning mappings are learned earlier.
    Cassani G; Limacher N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Aug; 75(8):1464-1482. PubMed ID: 34609218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Distinct fronto-temporal substrates of distributional and taxonomic similarity among words: evidence from RSA of BOLD signals.
    Carota F; Nili H; Pulvermüller F; Kriegeskorte N
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117408. PubMed ID: 33049407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Graph-Theoretic Properties of Networks Based on Word Association Norms: Implications for Models of Lexical Semantic Memory.
    Gruenenfelder TM; Recchia G; Rubin T; Jones MN
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 40(6):1460-95. PubMed ID: 26453571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The automaticity of semantic processing revisited: Auditory distraction by a categorical deviation.
    Vachon F; Marsh JE; Labonté K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jul; 149(7):1360-1397. PubMed ID: 31750710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Can word formation be understood or understanded by semantics alone?
    Gordon P; Miozzo M
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Feb; 56(1):30-72. PubMed ID: 17498681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The meaning of 'life' and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology.
    Hoffman P
    J Neuropsychol; 2016 Sep; 10(2):317-43. PubMed ID: 25708527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of relative embodiment in lexical and semantic processing of verbs.
    Sidhu DM; Kwan R; Pexman PM; Siakaluk PD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():32-9. PubMed ID: 24657828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond.
    Mahon BZ; Hickok G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):941-58. PubMed ID: 27282991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Unfolding meaning in context: The dynamics of conceptual similarity.
    Mirković J; Altmann GTM
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():19-43. PubMed ID: 30408707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Core Semantic Links or Lexical Associations: Assessing the Nature of Responses in Word Association Tasks.
    Vivas L; Manoiloff L; García AM; Lizarralde F; Vivas J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Feb; 48(1):243-256. PubMed ID: 30225580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Memory processes underlying long-term semantic priming.
    Was C; Woltz D; Hirsch D
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Feb; 47(2):313-325. PubMed ID: 30338486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The neural consequences of semantic richness: when more comes to mind, less activation is observed.
    Pexman PM; Hargreaves IS; Edwards JD; Henry LC; Goodyear BG
    Psychol Sci; 2007 May; 18(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 17576279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
    Hoffman P; Woollams AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. How words get meaning: The neural processing of novel object names after sensorimotor training.
    Bechtold L; Ghio M; Antoch G; Turowski B; Wittsack HJ; Tettamanti M; Bellebaum C
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():284-294. PubMed ID: 31034966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory.
    Cree GS; McNorgan C; McRae K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):643-58. PubMed ID: 16822138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Processing of lexical ambiguities in aphasia.
    Milberg W; Blumstein SE; Dworetzky B
    Brain Lang; 1987 May; 31(1):138-50. PubMed ID: 2437994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.