These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33104383)

  • 1. Who gives a criterion shift? A uniquely individualistic cognitive trait.
    Layher E; Dixit A; Miller MB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2075-2105. PubMed ID: 33104383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: a recognition memory study.
    Aminoff EM; Clewett D; Freeman S; Frithsen A; Tipper C; Johnson A; Grafton ST; Miller MB
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1016-30. PubMed ID: 22555888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-task and cross-manipulation stability in shifting the decision criterion.
    Frithsen A; Kantner J; Lopez BA; Miller MB
    Memory; 2018 May; 26(5):653-663. PubMed ID: 29108456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of introspection on judgment and decision making is dependent on the quality of conscious thinking.
    Leisti T; Häkkinen J
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():340-351. PubMed ID: 27131852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decision processes in visual search as a function of target prevalence.
    Peltier C; Becker MW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1466-76. PubMed ID: 27149294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Widespread frontoparietal fMRI activity is greatly affected by changes in criterion placement, not discriminability, during recognition memory and visual detection tests.
    Layher E; Santander T; Chakravarthula P; Marinsek N; Turner BO; Eckstein MP; Miller MB
    Neuroimage; 2023 Oct; 279():120307. PubMed ID: 37543259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shifting the criterion is not the difficult part of trial-by-trial criterion shifts in recognition memory.
    Starns JJ; Olchowski JE
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 25084988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reliability of criterion shifting in recognition memory is task dependent.
    Franks BA; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Nov; 44(8):1215-1227. PubMed ID: 27400995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in object recognition.
    Richler JJ; Tomarken AJ; Sunday MA; Vickery TJ; Ryan KF; Floyd RJ; Sheinberg D; Wong AC; Gauthier I
    Psychol Rev; 2019 Mar; 126(2):226-251. PubMed ID: 30802123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in cognitive control: the role of psychoticism and working memory in set-shifting.
    Smillie LD; Cooper AJ; Tharp IJ; Pelling EL
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Nov; 100(Pt 4):629-43. PubMed ID: 19049682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dynamic model of deciding not to choose.
    Reynolds A; Garton R; Kvam P; Sauer J; Osth AF; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jan; 150(1):42-66. PubMed ID: 32551778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.
    Siedlecka M; Skóra Z; Paulewicz B; Fijałkowska S; Timmermans B; Wierzchoń M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):712-723. PubMed ID: 29999396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in Cantonese Chinese word recognition: Insights from the Chinese Lexicon Project.
    Lim RY; Yap MJ; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):504-518. PubMed ID: 32019427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in use of the recognition heuristic are stable across time, choice objects, domains, and presentation formats.
    Michalkiewicz M; Erdfelder E
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Apr; 44(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 26573057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterizing individual variation in the strategic use of attentional control.
    Irons JL; Leber AB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1637-1654. PubMed ID: 29975099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The striking similarities between standard, distractor-free, and target-free recognition.
    Cox JC; Dobbins IG
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):925-40. PubMed ID: 21476108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinguishing deliberate from systematic thinking.
    Amit A; Mentser S; Arieli S; Porzycki N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Mar; 120(3):765-788. PubMed ID: 32134307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criterion noise in ratings-based recognition: evidence from the effects of response scale length on recognition accuracy.
    Benjamin AS; Tullis JG; Lee JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1601-8. PubMed ID: 23421510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive and neural architecture of decision making competence.
    Román FJ; Colom R; Hillman CH; Kramer AF; Cohen NJ; Barbey AK
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():172-183. PubMed ID: 31154047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Executive function in Tourette's syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Watkins LH; Sahakian BJ; Robertson MM; Veale DM; Rogers RD; Pickard KM; Aitken MR; Robbins TW
    Psychol Med; 2005 Apr; 35(4):571-82. PubMed ID: 15856727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.