These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33104927)

  • 1. The Temporal Fine Structure of Background Noise Determines the Benefit of Bimodal Hearing for Recognizing Speech.
    Stronks HC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 21(6):527-544. PubMed ID: 33104927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.
    Liu YW; Tao DD; Chen B; Cheng X; Shu Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1316-1327. PubMed ID: 30882534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Benefit of Bimodal Hearing and Beamforming for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Langerak NC; Stronks HC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 38447538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.
    Sheffield BM; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):518-30. PubMed ID: 22280613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural summation, binaural unmasking and fluctuating masker benefit in bimodal and bilateral adult cochlear implant users.
    de Graaff F; Eikelboom RH; Sucher C; Kramer SE; Smits C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Sep; 22(5):245-256. PubMed ID: 33832408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
    Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.
    Kessler DM; Ananthakrishnan S; Smith SB; D'Onofrio K; Gifford RH
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520902001. PubMed ID: 32003296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.
    Tejani VD; Brown CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3667. PubMed ID: 32486815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bimodal benefit depends on the performance difference between a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Yoon YS; Shin YR; Gho JS; Fu QJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 25329752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandarin speech perception in combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Li Y; Zhang G; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112471. PubMed ID: 25386962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Criteria for Selecting an Optimal Device for the Contralateral Ear of Children with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant.
    Jeong SW; Kang MY; Kim LS
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 26277845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing.
    Visram AS; Azadpour M; Kluk K; McKay CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4042-50. PubMed ID: 22559377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.