176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33104963)
1. Surgical resection of T4 colon cancers: an NCDB propensity score-matched analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.
Parascandola SA; Horsey ML; Hota S; Sparks AD; Tampo MMT; Kim G; Obias V
J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):701-710. PubMed ID: 33104963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.
Horsey ML; Parascandola SA; Sparks AD; Hota S; Ng M; Obias V
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 33638109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical management of splenic flexure colon cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched study comparing open and minimally invasive approaches using the national cancer database.
Horsey ML; Sparks AD; Lai D; Herur-Raman A; Ng M; Obias V
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Dec; 36(12):2739-2747. PubMed ID: 34536115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in utilization, conversion rates, and outcomes for minimally invasive approaches to non-metastatic rectal cancer: a national cancer database analysis.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Sparks AD; Boulos S; Cavallo K; Kim G; Obias V
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3154-3165. PubMed ID: 32601761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for stage I-III colon cancer: oncologic and long-term survival outcomes.
Mirkin KA; Kulaylat AS; Hollenbeak CS; Messaris E
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2894-2901. PubMed ID: 29273877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted resection of T4 rectal cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a national cancer database.
Emile SH; Horesh N; Freund MR; Garoufalia Z; Gefen R; Silva-Alvarenga E; Dasilva G; Wexner SD
Br J Surg; 2023 Jan; 110(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 36471483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive surgery for T4 colon cancer is associated with better outcomes compared to open surgery in the National Cancer Database.
El-Sharkawy F; Gushchin V; Plerhoples TA; Liu C; Emery EL; Collins DT; Bijelic L
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Apr; 47(4):818-827. PubMed ID: 32951935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of outcome and cost between the open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide hospital record database.
Chiu CC; Hsu WT; Choi JJ; Galm B; Lee MG; Chang CN; Liu CC; Lee CC
Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3757-3765. PubMed ID: 30675661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic Approach is Associated With a Lower Conversion Rate Compared to Laparoscopic Approach for Patients Undergoing Colectomy for T4b Colon Cancer. An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Kamel MK; Al-Qudah G; Shchatsko A; Keane CA; Serpa E; Nituica C; Blebea J; Marar O
Surg Innov; 2023 Apr; 30(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 36069752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic and laparoscopic colectomy: propensity score-matched outcomes from a national cancer database.
Emile SH; Horesh N; Garoufalia Z; Gefen R; Zhou P; Strassman V; Wexner SD
Br J Surg; 2023 May; 110(6):717-726. PubMed ID: 37075480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival.
Lee L; Wong-Chong N; Kelly JJ; Nassif GJ; Albert MR; Monson JRT
Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):460-470. PubMed ID: 29967992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frailer Patients Undergoing Robotic Colectomies for Colon Cancer Experience Increased Complication Rates Compared With Open or Laparoscopic Approaches.
Lo BD; Leeds IL; Sundel MH; Gearhart S; Nisly GRC; Safar B; Atallah C; Fang SH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 May; 63(5):588-597. PubMed ID: 32032198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach for left-sided colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study.
Rein LKL; Dohrn N; Gögenur I; Falk Klein M
Colorectal Dis; 2023 Dec; 25(12):2366-2377. PubMed ID: 37919465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.
Kethman WC; Harris AHS; Morris AM; Shelton A; Kirilcuk N; Kin C
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 31764247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reevaluation of laparoscopic surgery's value in pathological T4 colon cancer with comparison to open surgery: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.
Liu Q; Luo D; Lian P; Yu W; Zhu J; Cai S; Li Q; Li X
Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():12-17. PubMed ID: 29555522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety.
Konstantinidis IT; Ituarte P; Woo Y; Warner SG; Melstrom K; Kim J; Singh G; Lee B; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4932-4942. PubMed ID: 31820161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
