These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3310503)
1. Small for dates: evaluation of different diagnostic methods. Horacio Fescina R; Martell M; Martinez G; Lastra L; Schwarcz R Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1987; 66(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 3310503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying the small-for-gestational-age fetus on the basis of enhanced surfactant production. Sher G; Statland BE; Knutzen VK Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jan; 61(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 6687405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antenatal screening of small-for-gestational age infants by symphysial-fundal height measurement. Linasmita V J Med Assoc Thai; 1985 Nov; 68(11):587-91. PubMed ID: 4086951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrauterine volume, fetal abdominal area and biparietal diameter measurements with ultrasound in the prediction of small-for-dates babies in a high-risk obstetric population. Geirsson RT; Patel NB; Christie AD Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Sep; 92(9):936-40. PubMed ID: 3899164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method: measurement of uterine height. Belizán JM; Villar J; Nardin JC; Malamud J; De Vicurna LS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jul; 131(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 686050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Routine ultrasound screening for early detection of small for gestational age fetuses. Rosendahl H; Kivinen S Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Apr; 71(4):518-21. PubMed ID: 3281072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of intrauterine volume, fetal abdominal area and biparietal diameter measurements with ultrasound in screening for small-for-dates babies. Geirsson RT; Patel NB; Christie AD Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Sep; 92(9):929-35. PubMed ID: 3899163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of fetal abdominal circumference measurements and Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of small-for-dates babies and fetal compromise. Chambers SE; Hoskins PR; Haddad NG; Johnstone FD; McDicken WN; Muir BB Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Jul; 96(7):803-8. PubMed ID: 2669932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrauterine growth followed ultrasonically in normal and some complicated pregnancies. Kirkinen P Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1979; 68(194):1-65. PubMed ID: 380446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of maternal and fetal characteristics on diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation. Carrat F; Ringa V; Blondel B; Bréart G Fetal Diagn Ther; 1990; 5(3-4):114-23. PubMed ID: 2130837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biometric and dynamic ultrasound assessment of small-for-dates infants: report of 260 cases. Kurjak A; Kirkinen P; Latin V Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 7437105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Brown HL; Miller JM; Gabert HA; Kissling G Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 69(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 3547215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On twin care: early detection of twin pregnancies with the use of charts of normal uterine height and waist measurements. Schneider L; Bessis R; Hajeri H; Papiernik E Prog Clin Biol Res; 1978; 24 Pt C():143-6. PubMed ID: 364491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonic assessment of fetal head and body sizes in relation to normal and retarded fetal growth. Wladimiroff JW; Bloemsma CA; Wallenburg HC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Aug; 131(8):857-60. PubMed ID: 686084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]