These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33105258)

  • 21. Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Lowers the Sustained Listening Effort During Continuous Speech in Noise-A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study.
    Fiedler L; Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Alickovic E; Lunner T; Wendt D
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1590-1601. PubMed ID: 33950865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
    Hunter CR; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effect of Breathy Vocal Quality on Speech Intelligibility and Listening Effort in Background Noise.
    Shen J; Heller Murray E; Kulick ER
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231206925. PubMed ID: 37817666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment.
    Kirk KI; Pisoni DB; Miyamoto RC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1395-405. PubMed ID: 9430759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: a new high-variability sentence recognition test.
    Gilbert JL; Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 23231814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task.
    Wang Y; Naylor G; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Wendt D; Ohlenforst B; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 29117062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior.
    Peelle JE
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):204-214. PubMed ID: 28938250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. AVATAR Assesses Speech Understanding and Multitask Costs in Ecologically Relevant Listening Situations.
    Devesse A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):521-531. PubMed ID: 31356387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An Integrative Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Directional Microphone and Noise-Reduction Algorithm under Realistic Signal-to-Noise Ratios.
    Kuk F; Slugocki C; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):262-270. PubMed ID: 31589137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Effect of Musical Training and Working Memory in Adverse Listening Situations.
    Escobar J; Mussoi BS; Silberer AB
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):278-288. PubMed ID: 32106117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Sequential Sentence Paradigm Using Revised PRESTO Sentence Lists.
    Plotkowski AR; Alexander JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):647-60. PubMed ID: 27564442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of Speech-to-Noise Ratio and Luminance on a Range of Current and Potential Pupil Response Measures to Assess Listening Effort.
    Książek P; Zekveld AA; Wendt D; Fiedler L; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211009351. PubMed ID: 33926329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cogmed Training Does Not Generalize to Real-World Benefits for Adult Hearing Aid Users: Results of a Blinded, Active-Controlled Randomized Trial.
    Henshaw H; Heinrich A; Tittle A; Ferguson M
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):741-763. PubMed ID: 34524150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Luminance effects on pupil dilation in speech-in-noise recognition.
    Zhang Y; Malaval F; Lehmann A; Deroche MLD
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278506. PubMed ID: 36459511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.