118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33105511)
21. Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume measured by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in patients with endometrial cancer.
Chung HH; Lee I; Kim HS; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Cheon GJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Sep; 130(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 23791826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prognostic significance of semi-quantitative FDG-PET parameters in stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Shrestha S; Higuchi T; Shirai K; Tokue A; Shrestha S; Saitoh JI; Hirasawa H; Ohno T; Nakano T; Tsushima Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 31758225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prognostic Value of 16α-
Yamada S; Tsuyoshi H; Yamamoto M; Tsujikawa T; Kiyono Y; Okazawa H; Yoshida Y
J Nucl Med; 2021 May; 62(5):636-642. PubMed ID: 33008930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Liao S; Penney BC; Wroblewski K; Zhang H; Simon CA; Kampalath R; Shih MC; Shimada N; Chen S; Salgia R; Appelbaum DE; Suzuki K; Chen CT; Pu Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jan; 39(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 21946983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents.
Hwang SH; Cho A; Yun M; Choi YD; Rha SY; Kang WJ
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):e235-e241. PubMed ID: 28288043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic Value of the Sum of Metabolic Tumor Volume of Primary Tumor and Lymph Nodes Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Hong JH; Min KJ; Lee JK; So KA; Jung US; Kim S; Eo JS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(9):e2992. PubMed ID: 26945420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic significance of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma.
Calles-Sastre L; Mucientes-Rasilla J; San-Frutos Llorente LM; Royuela A; Garcia-Espantaleón Navas M; Herrero Gámiz S; Pérez-Medina T
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 30366731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Association of mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial cancer with
Sun X; Yao X; Zeng B; Zhu L; Shang Y; Zhang Q; He L; Jiang L
Ann Nucl Med; 2023 Dec; 37(12):655-664. PubMed ID: 37743402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT for patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].
Ding CY; Guo Z; Sun J; Yang WP; Li TR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 40(7):528-533. PubMed ID: 30060362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of Mediastinal Tumors Using SUV
Morita T; Tatsumi M; Ishibashi M; Isohashi K; Kato H; Honda O; Shimosegawa E; Tomiyama N; Hatazawa J
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2017; 5(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 28840135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Volume-based parameters on FDG PET may predict the proliferative potential of soft-tissue sarcomas.
Kitao T; Shiga T; Hirata K; Sekizawa M; Takei T; Yamashiro K; Tamaki N
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 33(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 30196378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pretreatment quantitative
Gencturk M; Ozturk K; Koksel Y; Li F; Cayci Z
Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():17-24. PubMed ID: 30308429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metabolic parameters using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT correlate with occult lymph node metastasis in squamous cell lung carcinoma.
Kim DH; Song BI; Hong CM; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Lee J; Ahn BC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Nov; 41(11):2051-7. PubMed ID: 24990401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36.
Satoh K; Sadowski SM; Dieckmann W; Quezado M; Nilubol N; Kebebew E; Patel D
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):714-721. PubMed ID: 27638678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic value of volumetric PET parameters in unresectable and metastatic esophageal cancer.
Tamandl D; Ta J; Schmid R; Preusser M; Paireder M; Schoppmann SF; Haug A; Ba-Ssalamah A
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Mar; 85(3):540-5. PubMed ID: 26860665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction of breast cancer recurrence using lymph node metabolic and volumetric parameters from
Kim YI; Kim YJ; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Lee DS; Chung JK; Kang KW
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Oct; 44(11):1787-1795. PubMed ID: 28616695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prediction of cervical metastasis and survival in cN0 oral cavity cancer using tumour
Bae MR; Roh JL; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Dec; 146(12):3341-3348. PubMed ID: 32642973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The prognostic role of FDG PET/CT before combined radio-chemotherapy in anal cancer patients.
Leccisotti L; Manfrida S; Barone R; Ripani D; Tagliaferri L; Masiello V; Privitera V; Gambacorta MA; Rufini V; Valentini V; Giordano A
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Jan; 34(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 31728763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
