These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33106087)
1. Risk Ladder, Table, or Bulleted List? Identifying Formats That Effectively Communicate Personalized Risk and Risk Reduction Information for Multiple Diseases. Waters EA; Maki J; Liu Y; Ackermann N; Carter CR; Dart H; Bowen DJ; Cameron LD; Colditz GA Med Decis Making; 2021 Jan; 41(1):74-88. PubMed ID: 33106087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining risk communication strategies to simultaneously convey the risks of four diseases associated with physical inactivity to socio-demographically diverse populations. Janssen E; Ruiter RAC; Waters EA J Behav Med; 2018 Jun; 41(3):318-332. PubMed ID: 29027602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial. Housten AJ; Kamath GR; Bevers TB; Cantor SB; Dixon N; Hite A; Kallen MA; Leal VB; Li L; Volk RJ Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 31795820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Using Separate Single-Outcome Risk Presentations Instead of Integrated Multioutcome Formats Improves Comprehension in Discrete Choice Experiments. Wallace MJ; Weissler EH; Yang JC; Brotzman L; Corriere MA; Secemsky EA; Sutphin J; Johnson FR; Marcos Gonzalez J; Tarver ME; Saha A; Chen AL; Gebben DJ; Malone M; Farb A; Babalola O; Rorer EM; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Reed SD Med Decis Making; 2024 Aug; 44(6):649-660. PubMed ID: 38903012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy. van Weert JCM; Alblas MC; van Dijk L; Jansen J Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Jan; 104(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 32727670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Graph literacy: a cross-cultural comparison. Galesic M; Garcia-Retamero R Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):444-57. PubMed ID: 20671213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design. Dowding D; Merrill JA; Onorato N; Barrón Y; Rosati RJ; Russell D J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Feb; 25(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 28460091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study. Scalia P; Schubbe DC; Lu ES; Durand MA; Frascara J; Noel G; O'Malley AJ; Elwyn G PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253644. PubMed ID: 34297713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors Affecting Physicians' Intentions to Communicate Personalized Prognostic Information to Cancer Patients at the End of Life: An Experimental Vignette Study. Han PK; Dieckmann NF; Holt C; Gutheil C; Peters E Med Decis Making; 2016 Aug; 36(6):703-13. PubMed ID: 26985015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Hawley ST; Zikmund-Fisher B; Ubel P; Jancovic A; Lucas T; Fagerlin A Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):448-55. PubMed ID: 18755566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Barriers in using cardiometabolic risk information among consumers with low health literacy. Damman OC; Bogaerts NM; van Dongen D; Timmermans DR Br J Health Psychol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):135-56. PubMed ID: 26213137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Presenting decision-relevant numerical information to Dutch women aged 50-70 with varying levels of health literacy: Case example of adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. van Strien-Knippenberg IS; Timmermans DRM; Engelhardt EG; Konings IRHM; Damman OC PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0309668. PubMed ID: 39226280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools. Nayak JG; Hartzler AL; Macleod LC; Izard JP; Dalkin BM; Gore JL Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Mar; 99(3):448-454. PubMed ID: 26481910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of using visual images of the body within a personalized health risk assessment: an experimental study. Hollands GJ; Marteau TM Br J Health Psychol; 2013 May; 18(2):263-78. PubMed ID: 23279308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Lure of Beauty: People Select Representations of Statistical Information Largely Based on Attractiveness, Not Comprehensibility. Gaissmaier W; Tiede KE; Garcia-Retamero R Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):774-788. PubMed ID: 37872798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Ubel PA Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(6):661-71. PubMed ID: 20375419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Use of Technology for Communicating With Clinicians or Seeking Health Information in a Multilingual Urban Cohort: Cross-Sectional Survey. Khoong EC; Rivadeneira NA; Hiatt RA; Sarkar U J Med Internet Res; 2020 Apr; 22(4):e16951. PubMed ID: 32250280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using a familiar risk comparison within a risk ladder to improve risk understanding by low numerates: a study of visual attention. Keller C Risk Anal; 2011 Jul; 31(7):1043-54. PubMed ID: 21284684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]