BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33106175)

  • 1. Best practices for variant calling in clinical sequencing.
    Koboldt DC
    Genome Med; 2020 Oct; 12(1):91. PubMed ID: 33106175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers.
    Chen J; Li X; Zhong H; Meng Y; Du H
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9345. PubMed ID: 31249349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. mirTrios: an integrated pipeline for detection of de novo and rare inherited mutations from trios-based next-generation sequencing.
    Li J; Jiang Y; Wang T; Chen H; Xie Q; Shao Q; Ran X; Xia K; Sun ZS; Wu J
    J Med Genet; 2015 Apr; 52(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 25596308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Free-access copy-number variant detection tools for targeted next-generation sequencing data.
    Roca I; González-Castro L; Fernández H; Couce ML; Fernández-Marmiesse A
    Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2019; 779():114-125. PubMed ID: 31097148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
    Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
    BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data.
    Pabinger S; Dander A; Fischer M; Snajder R; Sperk M; Efremova M; Krabichler B; Speicher MR; Zschocke J; Trajanoski Z
    Brief Bioinform; 2014 Mar; 15(2):256-78. PubMed ID: 23341494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Long-Read Sequencing Approach for Direct Haplotype Phasing in Clinical Settings.
    Maestri S; Maturo MG; Cosentino E; Marcolungo L; Iadarola B; Fortunati E; Rossato M; Delledonne M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 33271988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Towards a national standardisation of NGS studies in the diagnosis of myopathies].
    Krahn M; Cerino M; Campana-Salort E; Cossée M
    Med Sci (Paris); 2017 Nov; 33 Hors série n°1():30-33. PubMed ID: 29139383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation and assessment of variant calling pipelines for next-generation sequencing.
    Pirooznia M; Kramer M; Parla J; Goes FS; Potash JB; McCombie WR; Zandi PP
    Hum Genomics; 2014 Jul; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 25078893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Oncomine
    Williams HL; Walsh K; Diamond A; Oniscu A; Deans ZC
    Virchows Arch; 2018 Oct; 473(4):489-503. PubMed ID: 30105577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Annotation of Variant Data from High-Throughput DNA Sequencing from Tumor Specimens: Filtering Strategies to Identify Driver Mutations.
    Sun S; Thorson JA; Murray SS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1908():49-60. PubMed ID: 30649720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmarking datasets for assembly-based variant calling using high-fidelity long reads.
    Lee H; Kim J; Lee J
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Mar; 24(1):148. PubMed ID: 36973656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comprehensive fundamental somatic variant calling and quality management strategies for human cancer genomes.
    He X; Chen S; Li R; Han X; He Z; Yuan D; Zhang S; Duan X; Niu B
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32510555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tool evaluation for the detection of variably sized indels from next generation whole genome and targeted sequencing data.
    Wang N; Lysenkov V; Orte K; Kairisto V; Aakko J; Khan S; Elo LL
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Feb; 18(2):e1009269. PubMed ID: 35176018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Somatic and Germline Variant Calling from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
    Chang TC; Xu K; Cheng Z; Wu G
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1361():37-54. PubMed ID: 35230682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short and long-read genome sequencing methodologies for somatic variant detection; genomic analysis of a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
    Roberts HE; Lopopolo M; Pagnamenta AT; Sharma E; Parkes D; Lonie L; Freeman C; Knight SJL; Lunter G; Dreau H; Lockstone H; Taylor JC; Schuh A; Bowden R; Buck D
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6408. PubMed ID: 33742045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
    Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of copy number variant detection from panel-based next-generation sequencing data.
    Yao R; Yu T; Qing Y; Wang J; Shen Y
    Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2019 Jan; 7(1):e00513. PubMed ID: 30565893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of INDEL Calling Tools with Simulation Data and Real Short-Read Data.
    Li D; Kim W; Wang L; Yoon KA; Park B; Park C; Kong SY; Hwang Y; Baek D; Lee ES; Won S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(5):1635-1644. PubMed ID: 30004886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical validation of targeted next-generation sequencing for inherited disorders.
    Yohe S; Hauge A; Bunjer K; Kemmer T; Bower M; Schomaker M; Onsongo G; Wilson J; Erdmann J; Zhou Y; Deshpande A; Spears MD; Beckman K; Silverstein KA; Thyagarajan B
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 139(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 25611102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.