These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33106408)

  • 1. Electoral College bias and the 2020 presidential election.
    Erikson RS; Sigman K; Yao L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(45):27940-27944. PubMed ID: 33106408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diverging Life Expectancies and Voting Patterns in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    Bor J
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Oct; 107(10):1560-1562. PubMed ID: 28817322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election.
    Baccini L; Brodeur A; Weymouth S
    J Popul Econ; 2021; 34(2):739-767. PubMed ID: 33469244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. (Un)happiness and voting in U.S. presidential elections.
    Ward G; De Neve JE; Ungar LH; Eichstaedt JC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Feb; 120(2):370-383. PubMed ID: 32700960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nail in the Coffin or Lifeline? Evaluating the Electoral Impact of COVID-19 on President Trump in the 2020 Election.
    Algara C; Amlani S; Collitt S; Hale I; Kazemian S
    Polit Behav; 2022 Oct; ():1-29. PubMed ID: 36311381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Facebook data to predict the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Chang KC; Chiang CF; Lin MJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0253560. PubMed ID: 34851951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Another issue comes out: gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections.
    Rhodebeck LA
    J Homosex; 2015; 62(6):701-34. PubMed ID: 25530286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Life expectancy and voting patterns in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
    Curtis LH; Hoffman MN; Califf RM; Hammill BG
    SSM Popul Health; 2021 Sep; 15():100840. PubMed ID: 34169139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.
    Mongrain P
    Polit Res Q; 2023 Dec; 76(4):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37916035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Did Covid-19 Kill Trump Politically? The Pandemic and Voting in the 2020 Presidential Election.
    Clarke H; Stewart MC; Ho K
    Soc Sci Q; 2021 Sep; 102(5):2194-2209. PubMed ID: 34226770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent Relationship of Changes in Death Rates with Changes in US Presidential Voting.
    Goldman L; Lim MP; Chen Q; Jin P; Muennig P; Vagelos A
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 34(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 30187378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vote-by-Mail: COVID-19 and the 2020 Presidential Primaries.
    Niebler S
    Society; 2020; 57(5):547-553. PubMed ID: 33144746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data.
    Rizk R; Rizk D; Rizk F; Hsu S
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37360912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. House Republicans were rewarded for supporting Donald Trump's 'stop the steal' efforts.
    Bartels LM; Carnes N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Aug; 120(34):e2309072120. PubMed ID: 37579164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trump Knows Best: Donald Trump's Rejection of Expertise and the 2020 Presidential Election.
    Brewer MD
    Society; 2020; 57(6):657-661. PubMed ID: 33424054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.
    Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Electoral Consequences of Affective Polarization? Negative Voting in the 2020 US Presidential Election.
    Garzia D; Ferreira da Silva F
    Am Polit Res; 2022 May; 50(3):303-311. PubMed ID: 35469326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 2 million-person, campaign-wide field experiment shows how digital advertising affects voter turnout.
    Aggarwal M; Allen J; Coppock A; Frankowski D; Messing S; Zhang K; Barnes J; Beasley A; Hantman H; Zheng S
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Mar; 7(3):332-341. PubMed ID: 36635584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forensic analysis of Venezuelan elections during the Chávez presidency.
    Jiménez R; Hidalgo M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100884. PubMed ID: 24971462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.