These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33107453)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of wear resistance of CAD-CAM zirconia and cast cobalt chromium alloy for indirect restorations against human enamel - An
    Kumar NA; Sampathkumar J; Ramakrishnan H; Mahadevan V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(4):537-545. PubMed ID: 33107453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of the wear of dental alloys against monolithic zirconia.
    Cha MS; Huh YH; Cho LR; Park CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):866-873. PubMed ID: 31653400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics.
    Park JH; Park S; Lee K; Yun KD; Lim HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 24199603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of wear behavior of dental restorative materials against zirconia in vitro.
    Maier E; Grottschreiber C; Knepper I; Opdam N; Petschelt A; Loomans B; Lohbauer U
    Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):778-788. PubMed ID: 35459553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wear analysis and topographical properties of monolithic zirconia and CoCr against human enamel after polishing and glazing procedures.
    Fontolliet A; Al-Haj Husain N; Özcan M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 May; 105():103712. PubMed ID: 32279854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enamel wear against monolithic zirconia restorations: A meta-analysis and systematic review of in vitro studies.
    Aljomard YRM; Altunok EÇ; Kara HB
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Apr; 34(3):473-489. PubMed ID: 34623015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wear resistance and abrasiveness of CAD-CAM monolithic materials.
    Ludovichetti FS; Trindade FZ; Werner A; Kleverlaan CJ; Fonseca RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):318.e1-318.e8. PubMed ID: 30097264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments.
    Amer R; Kürklü D; Kateeb E; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 24836531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Clinical Comparative Evaluation Of The Wear Of Enamel Antagonist To Monolithic Zirconia And Metal-Ceramic Crowns.
    Deval P; Tembhurne J; Gangurde A; Chauhan M; Jaiswal N; Tiwari DK
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(6):744–751. PubMed ID: 33750998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel.
    Janyavula S; Lawson N; Cakir D; Beck P; Ramp LC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 23328193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wear Characteristics and Volume Loss of CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials.
    Zurek AD; Alfaro MF; Wee AG; Yuan JC; Barao VA; Mathew MT; Sukotjo C
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e510-e518. PubMed ID: 29508487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of enamel wear against monolithic zirconia and layered zirconia after polishing and glazing: An
    Shaik K; Reddy KM; Shastry YM; Aditya SV; Babu PJK
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):354-360. PubMed ID: 36511069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The abrasive effect of a porcelain and a nickel-chromium alloy on the wear of human enamel and the influence of a carbonated beverage on the rate of wear.
    Joshi N; Patil NP; Patil SB
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 20113396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel.
    D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Rondoni GD; De Angelis F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):350-5. PubMed ID: 26553254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
    de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Evaluation of Wear of Natural Enamel Antagonist Against Glazed Monolithic Zirconia Crowns and Polished Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: An In Vivo Study.
    Dondani JR; Pardeshi V; Gangurde A; Shaikh A; Mahule A; Deval P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023; 36(3):273–281. PubMed ID: 35998079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-body wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia and their corresponding enamel antagonists.
    Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Schmutz F; Trottmann A; Roos M; Hämmerle CH
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Jan; 71(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 22364372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing and glazing.
    Lawson NC; Janyavula S; Syklawer S; McLaren EA; Burgess JO
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1586-91. PubMed ID: 25257823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.
    Alarcon JV; Engelmeier RL; Powers JM; Triolo PT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 19374708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.