These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33108053)

  • 41. Assessing treatment effects and publication bias across different specialties in medicine: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Schwab S; Kreiliger G; Held L
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e045942. PubMed ID: 34521659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Orthopedic Literature in Medical Journals-Is It Negatively Biased?
    Delanois RE; Gwam CU; Piuzzi NS; Chughtai M; Malkani AL; Bonutti PM; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):615-619. PubMed ID: 28993088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Quantitative Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Herbal Medicine Research: The Road to Improvement.
    Naumann K
    J Altern Complement Med; 2018 Feb; 24(2):168-181. PubMed ID: 28915066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods.
    Mueller KF; Meerpohl JJ; Briel M; Antes G; von Elm E; Lang B; Gloy V; Motschall E; Schwarzer G; Bassler D
    Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; 2():60. PubMed ID: 23885765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies.
    Evoniuk G; Mansi B; DeCastro B; Sykes J
    BMJ; 2017 Apr; 357():j1726. PubMed ID: 28432051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results.
    Hopewell S; Loudon K; Clarke MJ; Oxman AD; Dickersin K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jan; 2009(1):MR000006. PubMed ID: 19160345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Using selection models to assess sensitivity to publication bias: A tutorial and call for more routine use.
    Maier M; VanderWeele TJ; Mathur MB
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 18(3):e1256. PubMed ID: 36909879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Press Releases of Drug-Related Randomized Trial Results Prior to Publication in High-Impact Journals: an Observational Study.
    Purohit U; Sacks CA; Raissi A; Hughes E; Boctor M; Manzoor S; Hodzic-Santor B; Zhu K; Raudanskis A; Ross JS; Fralick M
    J Gen Intern Med; 2023 Nov; 38(14):3107-3114. PubMed ID: 37532876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey.
    Ahmed I; Sutton AJ; Riley RD
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7762. PubMed ID: 22214758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Perils of Misinterpreting and Misusing "Publication Bias" in Meta-analyses: An Education Review on Funnel Plot-Based Methods.
    Afonso J; Ramirez-Campillo R; Clemente FM; Büttner FC; Andrade R
    Sports Med; 2024 Feb; 54(2):257-269. PubMed ID: 37684502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
    Schmucker CM; Blümle A; Schell LK; Schwarzer G; Oeller P; Cabrera L; von Elm E; Briel M; Meerpohl JJ;
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176210. PubMed ID: 28441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
    Vaitkus PT; Brar C
    Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.
    Palma S; Delgado-Rodriguez M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Oct; 59(10):864-9. PubMed ID: 16166360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessing the risk of bias in choice of search sources for environmental meta-analyses.
    Konno K; Pullin AS
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Sep; 11(5):698-713. PubMed ID: 32618107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of Preprint Postings of Randomized Clinical Trials on COVID-19 and Corresponding Published Journal Articles: A Systematic Review.
    Bai AD; Jiang Y; Nguyen DL; Lo CKL; Stefanova I; Guo K; Wang F; Zhang C; Sayeau K; Garg A; Loeb M
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jan; 6(1):e2253301. PubMed ID: 36705921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57.
    Verharen JPH
    Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37922198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning.
    Dal-Ré R; Marušić A
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 72(10):1283-1288. PubMed ID: 27484242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.