These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33108646)
1. Long-Term Arterial Remodeling After Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation 4-Year Follow-up of Quantitative Coronary Angiography, Histology and Optical Coherence Tomography. Chen D; Dong Z; Xi Y; Chen C; Zhang S; Zeng S; Bi Y; Wu T; Xiao J Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2020 Dec; 11(6):636-645. PubMed ID: 33108646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First in human evaluation of the vascular biocompatibility and biomechanical performance of a novel ultra high molecular weight amorphous PLLA bioresorbable scaffold in the absence of anti-proliferative drugs: Two-year imaging results in humans. Moncada M; Delgado JA; Colombo A; Gasior P; Ramzipoor K; Estrada A; Lee C; Dokko D; Granada JF Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 92(3):E246-E253. PubMed ID: 29243353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results. Verheye S; Ormiston JA; Stewart J; Webster M; Sanidas E; Costa R; Costa JR; Chamie D; Abizaid AS; Pinto I; Morrison L; Toyloy S; Bhat V; Yan J; Abizaid A JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 24139932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized Comparison of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and Mirage Microfiber Sirolimus-Eluting Scaffold Using Multimodality Imaging. Tenekecioglu E; Serruys PW; Onuma Y; Costa R; Chamié D; Sotomi Y; Yu TB; Abizaid A; Liew HB; Santoso T JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(11):1115-1130. PubMed ID: 28527768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First-in-human evaluation of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: imaging and clinical results of the DESSOLVE I Trial (DES with sirolimus and a bioabsorbable polymer for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in the native coronary arteries). Ormiston J; Webster M; Stewart J; Vrolix M; Whitbourn R; Donohoe D; Knape C; Lansky A; Attizzani GF; Fitzgerald P; Kandzari DE; Wijns W JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1026-34. PubMed ID: 24055443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Six-month evaluation of novel bioabsorbable scaffolds composed of poly-L-lactic acid and amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles in porcine coronary arteries. Dinh Nguyen T; Feng G; Yi X; Lyu Y; Lan Z; Xia J; Wu T; Jiang X J Biomater Appl; 2018 Aug; 33(2):227-233. PubMed ID: 30096995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioresorption and Vessel Wall Integration of a Fully Bioresorbable Polymeric Everolimus-Eluting Scaffold: Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Histological Study in a Porcine Model With 4-Year Follow-Up. Nakatani S; Ishibashi Y; Sotomi Y; Perkins L; Eggermont J; Grundeken MJ; Dijkstra J; Rapoza R; Virmani R; Serruys PW; Onuma Y JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 9(8):838-851. PubMed ID: 27101910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. OCT-assessment of scaffold resorption: Analysis of strut intensity by a new resorption index for poly-l-lactic acid bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Marwan M; Tröbs M; Boeder N; Doerr O; Weissner M; Bauer T; Nef H; Hamm C; Schlundt C Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Dec; 94(7):928-935. PubMed ID: 30945432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strut protrusion and shape impact on endothelial shear stress: insights from pre-clinical study comparing Mirage and Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds. Tenekecioglu E; Sotomi Y; Torii R; Bourantas C; Miyazaki Y; Collet C; Crake T; Su S; Onuma Y; Serruys PW Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1313-1322. PubMed ID: 28365819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous PLLA bioresorbable coronary scaffold upsized up to 0.8 mm beyond nominal diameter: An OCT and histopathology study in porcine coronary artery model. Gasior P; Cheng Y; Estrada EA; Jenn McGregor ; Ramzipoor K; Lee C; Conditt GB; Rousselle SD; Granada JF; Kaluza GL Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):378-386. PubMed ID: 28471065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A head to head comparison of XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold versus metallic sirolimus-eluting stent: 180 days follow-up in a porcine model. Shen L; Wu Y; Ge L; Zhang Y; Wang Q; Qian J; Qiu Z; Ge J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1473-1481. PubMed ID: 28639098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized Comparison Between Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Stent: Multimodality Imaging Through 3 Years. Onuma Y; Honda Y; Asano T; Shiomi H; Kozuma K; Ozaki Y; Namiki A; Yasuda S; Ueno T; Ando K; Furuya J; Hanaoka KI; Tanabe K; Okada K; Kitahara H; Ono M; Kusano H; Rapoza R; Simonton C; Popma JJ; Stone GW; Fitzgerald PJ; Serruys PW; Kimura T JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 13(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 31918929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]