654 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33108757)
1. Variant Classification Concordance using the ACMG-AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines across Nine Genomic Implementation Research Studies.
Amendola LM; Muenzen K; Biesecker LG; Bowling KM; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Driscoll C; Foreman AKM; Golden-Grant K; Greally JM; Hindorff L; Kanavy D; Jobanputra V; Johnston JJ; Kenny EE; McNulty S; Murali P; Ou J; Powell BC; Rehm HL; Rolf B; Roman TS; Van Ziffle J; Guha S; Abhyankar A; Crosslin D; Venner E; Yuan B; Zouk H; ; Jarvik GP
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Nov; 107(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33108757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Amendola LM; Jarvik GP; Leo MC; McLaughlin HM; Akkari Y; Amaral MD; Berg JS; Biswas S; Bowling KM; Conlin LK; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Dulik MC; Ghazani AA; Ghosh R; Green RC; Hart R; Horton C; Johnston JJ; Lebo MS; Milosavljevic A; Ou J; Pak CM; Patel RY; Punj S; Richards CS; Salama J; Strande NT; Yang Y; Plon SE; Biesecker LG; Rehm HL
Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 98(6):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 27181684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptation of ACMG-ClinGen Technical Standards for Copy Number Variant Interpretation Concordance.
Zhang K; Lin G; Han D; Han Y; Peng R; Li J
Front Genet; 2022; 13():829728. PubMed ID: 35360839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP Variant Classification Guidelines for Germline
Hatton JN; Frone MN; Cox HC; Crowley SB; Hiraki S; Yokoyama NN; Abul-Husn NS; Amatruda JF; Anderson MJ; Bofill-De Ros X; Carr AG; Chao EC; Chen KS; Gu S; Higgs C; Machado J; Ritter D; Schultz KA; Soper ER; Wu MK; Mester JL; Kim J; Foulkes WD; Witkowski L; Stewart DR
Hum Mutat; 2023; 2023():. PubMed ID: 38084291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adapting ACMG/AMP sequence variant classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants.
Brandt T; Sack LM; Arjona D; Tan D; Mei H; Cui H; Gao H; Bean LJH; Ankala A; Del Gaudio D; Knight Johnson A; Vincent LM; Reavey C; Lai A; Richard G; Meck JM
Genet Med; 2020 Feb; 22(2):336-344. PubMed ID: 31534211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of ACMG-Guideline-Based Variant Classification of Cancer Susceptibility and Non-Cancer-Associated Genes in Families Affected by Breast Cancer.
Maxwell KN; Hart SN; Vijai J; Schrader KA; Slavin TP; Thomas T; Wubbenhorst B; Ravichandran V; Moore RM; Hu C; Guidugli L; Wenz B; Domchek SM; Robson ME; Szabo C; Neuhausen SL; Weitzel JN; Offit K; Couch FJ; Nathanson KL
Am J Hum Genet; 2016 May; 98(5):801-817. PubMed ID: 27153395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disease-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines improve sequence variant interpretation for hearing loss.
Patel MJ; DiStefano MT; Oza AM; Hughes MY; Wilcox EH; Hemphill SE; Cushman BJ; Grant AR; Siegert RK; Shen J; Chapin A; Boczek NJ; Schimmenti LA; Nara K; Kenna M; Azaiez H; Booth KT; Avraham KB; Kremer H; Griffith AJ; Rehm HL; Amr SS; Tayoun ANA;
Genet Med; 2021 Nov; 23(11):2208-2212. PubMed ID: 34230634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Data sharing to improve concordance in variant interpretation across laboratories: results from the Canadian Open Genetics Repository.
Mighton C; Smith AC; Mayers J; Tomaszewski R; Taylor S; Hume S; Agatep R; Spriggs E; Feilotter HE; Semenuk L; Wong H; Lazo de la Vega L; Marshall CR; Axford MM; Silver T; Charames GS; Di Gioacchino V; Watkins N; Foulkes WD; Clavier M; Hamel N; Chong G; Lamont RE; Parboosingh J; Karsan A; Bosdet I; Young SS; Tucker T; Akbari MR; Speevak MD; Vaags AK; Lebo MS; Lerner-Ellis J;
J Med Genet; 2022 Jun; 59(6):571-578. PubMed ID: 33875564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical laboratories collaborate to resolve differences in variant interpretations submitted to ClinVar.
Harrison SM; Dolinsky JS; Knight Johnson AE; Pesaran T; Azzariti DR; Bale S; Chao EC; Das S; Vincent L; Rehm HL
Genet Med; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1096-1104. PubMed ID: 28301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant curation guidelines for the analysis of germline CDH1 sequence variants.
Lee K; Krempely K; Roberts ME; Anderson MJ; Carneiro F; Chao E; Dixon K; Figueiredo J; Ghosh R; Huntsman D; Kaurah P; Kesserwan C; Landrith T; Li S; Mensenkamp AR; Oliveira C; Pardo C; Pesaran T; Richardson M; Slavin TP; Spurdle AB; Trapp M; Witkowski L; Yi CS; Zhang L; Plon SE; Schrader KA; Karam R
Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1553-1568. PubMed ID: 30311375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward automation of germline variant curation in clinical cancer genetics.
Ravichandran V; Shameer Z; Kemel Y; Walsh M; Cadoo K; Lipkin S; Mandelker D; Zhang L; Stadler Z; Robson M; Offit K; Vijai J
Genet Med; 2019 Sep; 21(9):2116-2125. PubMed ID: 30787465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework.
Tavtigian SV; Greenblatt MS; Harrison SM; Nussbaum RL; Prabhu SA; Boucher KM; Biesecker LG;
Genet Med; 2018 Sep; 20(9):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 29300386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Interpretation of Sequence Variants.
Zhang J; Yao Y; He H; Shen J
Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2020 Jun; 106(1):e98. PubMed ID: 32176464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of in silico algorithms for use with ACMG/AMP clinical variant interpretation guidelines.
Ghosh R; Oak N; Plon SE
Genome Biol; 2017 Nov; 18(1):225. PubMed ID: 29179779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gene-specific criteria for PTEN variant curation: Recommendations from the ClinGen PTEN Expert Panel.
Mester JL; Ghosh R; Pesaran T; Huether R; Karam R; Hruska KS; Costa HA; Lachlan K; Ngeow J; Barnholtz-Sloan J; Sesock K; Hernandez F; Zhang L; Milko L; Plon SE; Hegde M; Eng C
Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1581-1592. PubMed ID: 30311380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ClinGen Pathogenicity Calculator: a configurable system for assessing pathogenicity of genetic variants.
Patel RY; Shah N; Jackson AR; Ghosh R; Pawliczek P; Paithankar S; Baker A; Riehle K; Chen H; Milosavljevic S; Bizon C; Rynearson S; Nelson T; Jarvik GP; Rehm HL; Harrison SM; Azzariti D; Powell B; Babb L; Plon SE; Milosavljevic A;
Genome Med; 2017 Jan; 9(1):3. PubMed ID: 28081714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consideration of Cosegregation in the Pathogenicity Classification of Genomic Variants.
Jarvik GP; Browning BL
Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 98(6):1077-1081. PubMed ID: 27236918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The current state of clinical interpretation of sequence variants.
Hoskinson DC; Dubuc AM; Mason-Suares H
Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2017 Feb; 42():33-39. PubMed ID: 28157586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying the potential of functional evidence to reclassify variants of uncertain significance in the categorical and Bayesian interpretation frameworks.
Brnich SE; Rivera-Muñoz EA; Berg JS
Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1531-1541. PubMed ID: 30095857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A machine learning approach based on ACMG/AMP guidelines for genomic variant classification and prioritization.
Nicora G; Zucca S; Limongelli I; Bellazzi R; Magni P
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2517. PubMed ID: 35169226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
