These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33109471)

  • 21. Effect of Lens Care Systems on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Hydrophobicity.
    Lira M; Silva R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 26859741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prevention of UV-induced damage to the anterior segment using class I UV-absorbing hydrogel contact lenses.
    Chandler HL; Reuter KS; Sinnott LT; Nichols JJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jan; 51(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 19710408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sagittal height differences of frequent replacement silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    van der Worp E; Mertz C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Jun; 38(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 25704462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can possible toxic effect of ultraviolet-A after corneal cross-linking be prevented? In vitro transmittance study of contact lenses at 370 nm wavelength.
    Bilgihan K; Yuksel E; Deniz NG; Yuksel N
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2015; 34(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 25363069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Crossover Evaluation of Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
    Wolffsohn JS; Mroczkowska S; Hunt OA; Bilkhu P; Drew T; Sheppard A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1063-8. PubMed ID: 26390350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Kinetic Deposition of Polar and Non-polar Lipids on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.
    Luensmann D; Omali NB; Suko A; Drolle E; Heynen M; Subbaraman LN; Scales C; Fadli Z; Jones L
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Dec; 45(12):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 32281422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In Vitro Cholesterol Deposition on Daily Disposable Contact Lens Materials.
    Walther H; Subbaraman L; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jan; 93(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 26583791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the Ocular Surface in Different Contact Lens Replacement Schedules.
    Muhafiz E; Bayhan HA; Şahin S; Göçmen AY; Aslan Bayhan S; Gürdal C
    Cornea; 2019 May; 38(5):587-594. PubMed ID: 30933963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses.
    Aakre BM; Ystenaes AE; Doughty MJ; Austrheim Ø; Westerfjell B; Lie MT
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Mar; 24(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 15005678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Objective Evaluation Of On-Eye Optical Quality Of Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens With Internal Wetting Agents.
    Koh S; Watanabe K; Nishida K
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():2159-2165. PubMed ID: 31806929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Micromechanical measurement of adhesion of dehydrating silicone hydrogel contact lenses to corneal tissue.
    Zhu D; Liu Y; Gilbert JL
    Acta Biomater; 2021 Jun; 127():242-251. PubMed ID: 33812075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Raman imaging of layered soft contact lenses.
    Krysztofiak K; Ciężar K; Kościński M
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2017 Apr; 15(2):e149-e152. PubMed ID: 27791229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Depth Profile Assessment of the Early Phase Deposition of Lysozyme on Soft Contact Lens Materials Using a Novel In Vitro Eye Model.
    Qiao H; Phan CM; Walther H; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S11-S18. PubMed ID: 28617725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantification of contact lens wettability after prolonged visual device use under low humidity conditions.
    Guillon M; Patel T; Patel K; Gupta R; Maissa CA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Aug; 42(4):386-391. PubMed ID: 30954378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization after photorefractive keratectomy.
    Yuksel E; Ozulken K; Uzel MM; Taslipinar Uzel AG; Aydoğan S
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):2569-2574. PubMed ID: 31065904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of multipurpose solutions on in vivo surface wettability of a silicone hydrogel lens.
    Lau JK; So HT; Chiang TK; Cho P
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Dec; 39(6):461-465. PubMed ID: 27484710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of tear film surface quality measured in vivo on water gradient silicone hydrogel and hydrogel contact lenses.
    Szczesna-Iskander DH
    Eye Contact Lens; 2014 Jan; 40(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 24335451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Physical Properties and Interaction With the Ocular Surface of Water-Gradient Contact Lenses.
    Ponzini E; Recchioni A; Cheloni R; Zeri F; Tavazzi S
    Eye Contact Lens; 2023 Apr; 49(4):152-159. PubMed ID: 36811833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Effect of Temperature on Soft Contact Lens Diameter.
    Young G; Potts M; Sulley A
    Eye Contact Lens; 2016 Sep; 42(5):298-302. PubMed ID: 26513721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A 12-month Prospective Study of Tear Osmolarity in Contact Lens Wearers Refitted with Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses.
    Garaszczuk IK; Mousavi M; Szczesna-Iskander DH; Cerviño A; Iskander DR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Mar; 97(3):178-185. PubMed ID: 32168240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.