258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33111370)
1. Gradient corrections for reference dosimetry using Farmer-type ionization chambers in single-layer scanned proton fields.
Palmans H; Medin J; Trnková P; Vatnitsky S
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6531-6539. PubMed ID: 33111370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy.
Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Bertrand D; Lee JA; Palmans H; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4919-4927. PubMed ID: 28656604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo simulated beam quality and perturbation correction factors for ionization chambers in monoenergetic proton beams.
Kretschmer J; Dulkys A; Brodbek L; Stelljes TS; Looe HK; Poppe B
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5890-5905. PubMed ID: 32989779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical note: Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement of the PTW-31010 ionization chamber in proton and carbon ion beams.
Barna S; Resch AF; Puchalska M; Georg D; Palmans H
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):675-681. PubMed ID: 34818685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam.
Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams.
Vilches-Freixas G; Bosmans G; Douralis A; Martens J; Meijers A; Rinaldi I; Salvo K; Thomas R; Palmans H; Lourenço A
Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(10):. PubMed ID: 38640918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams.
Palmans H; Lourenço A; Medin J; Vatnitsky S; Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(19):. PubMed ID: 36096096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Proton beam dosimetry in the presence of magnetic fields using Farmer-type ionization chambers of different radii.
Marot M; Surla S; Burke E; Brons S; Runz A; Greilich S; Karger CP; Jäkel O; Burigo LN
Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4590-4599. PubMed ID: 36940235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo calculation of perturbation correction factors for air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT.
Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
Z Med Phys; 2021 May; 31(2):175-191. PubMed ID: 33775521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the perturbation effect and LET dependence of beam quality correction factors in carbon ion beams.
Khan AU; Nelson NP; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1105-1120. PubMed ID: 36334024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of PTW-31015 PinPoint ionization chambers in photon and proton beams.
Carlino A; Stock M; Zagler N; Marrale M; Osorio J; Vatnitsky S; Palmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185020. PubMed ID: 30152791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proton dosimetry in a magnetic field: Measurement and calculation of magnetic field correction factors for a plane-parallel ionization chamber.
Gebauer B; Baumann KS; Fuchs H; Georg D; Oborn BM; Looe HK; Lühr A
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2293-2305. PubMed ID: 37898105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assurance of proton beams using a multilayer ionization chamber system.
Dhanesar S; Sahoo N; Kerr M; Taylor MB; Summers P; Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Gillin M
Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):092102. PubMed ID: 24007171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spread-out Bragg peak proton FLASH irradiation using a clinical synchrocyclotron: Proof of concept and ion chamber characterization.
Darafsheh A; Hao Y; Zhao X; Zwart T; Wagner M; Evans T; Reynoso F; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4472-4484. PubMed ID: 34077590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detector response in the buildup region of small MV fields.
Wegener S; Herzog B; Sauer OA
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1327-1339. PubMed ID: 31860128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical note: Point-by-point ion-recombination correction for accurate dose profile measurement in high dose-per-pulse irradiation field.
Kojima H; Ishikawa M; Takigami M
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7281-7293. PubMed ID: 37528637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The magnetic field dependent displacement effect and its correction in reference and relative dosimetry.
Tekin T; Blum I; Delfs B; Schönfeld AB; Poppe B; Looe HK
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(4):. PubMed ID: 35016163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fluence correction factors in plastic phantoms for clinical proton beams.
Palmans H; Symons JE; Denis JM; de Kock EA; Jones DT; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3055-71. PubMed ID: 12361210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical Note: Preferred dosimeter size and associated correction factors in commissioning high dose per pulse, flattening filter free x-ray beams.
Sudhyadhom A; Kirby N; Faddegon B; Chuang CF
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1507-13. PubMed ID: 26936734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
