These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33111557)

  • 1. Human Performance Consequences of Automated Decision Aids: The Impact of Time Pressure.
    Rieger T; Manzey D
    Hum Factors; 2022 Jun; 64(4):617-634. PubMed ID: 33111557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding the Impact of Time Pressure and Automation Support in a Visual Search Task.
    Rieger T; Manzey D
    Hum Factors; 2024 Mar; 66(3):770-786. PubMed ID: 35770911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Displaying contextual information reduces the costs of imperfect decision automation in rapid retasking of ISR assets.
    Rovira E; Cross A; Leitch E; Bonaceto C
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1036-49. PubMed ID: 25277015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Providing different levels of accuracy about the reliability of automation to a human operator: impact on human performance.
    Avril E
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):217-226. PubMed ID: 35451925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual search behavior and performance in luggage screening: effects of time pressure, automation aid, and target expectancy.
    Rieger T; Heilmann L; Manzey D
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Feb; 6(1):12. PubMed ID: 33630179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human performance consequences of automated decision aids in states of sleep loss.
    Reichenbach J; Onnasch L; Manzey D
    Hum Factors; 2011 Dec; 53(6):717-28. PubMed ID: 22235532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automation in nursing decision support systems: A systematic review of effects on decision making, care delivery, and patient outcomes.
    Akbar S; Lyell D; Magrabi F
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Oct; 28(11):2502-2513. PubMed ID: 34498063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who's the real expert here? Pedigree's unique bias on trust between human and automated advisers.
    Pearson CJ; Geden M; Mayhorn CB
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102907. PubMed ID: 31422272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do concurrent task demands impact the benefit of automation transparency?
    Tatasciore M; Bowden V; Loft S
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jul; 110():104022. PubMed ID: 37019048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring the Efficiency of Automation-Aided Performance in a Simulated Baggage Screening Task.
    Boskemper MM; Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2022 Sep; 64(6):945-961. PubMed ID: 33508964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmarking Aided Decision Making in a Signal Detection Task.
    Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2017 Sep; 59(6):881-900. PubMed ID: 28796974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content.
    McKendrick R; Shaw T; de Visser E; Saqer H; Kidwell B; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):463-75. PubMed ID: 24930169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trust and the Compliance-Reliance Paradigm: The Effects of Risk, Error Bias, and Reliability on Trust and Dependence.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Yamani Y; Handley HAH
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):333-345. PubMed ID: 28430544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of known decision support reliability on outcome quality and visual information foraging in joint decision making.
    Starke SD; Baber C
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jul; 86():103102. PubMed ID: 32342892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.
    de Visser EJ; Monfort SS; Goodyear K; Lu L; O'Hara M; Lee MR; Parasuraman R; Krueger F
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):116-133. PubMed ID: 28146673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Workload Capacity: A Response Time-Based Measure of Automation Dependence.
    Yamani Y; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):462-71. PubMed ID: 26811351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task.
    Rovira E; McGarry K; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 17315845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.