These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33112658)

  • 21. Effective doses of dental cone beam computed tomography: effect of 360-degree versus 180-degree rotation angles.
    Mutalik S; Tadinada A; Molina MR; Sinisterra A; Lurie A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Oct; 130(4):433-446. PubMed ID: 32616450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of coefficients to derive organ and effective doses from cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans: a Monte Carlo study.
    Abuhaimed A; Martin CJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):189-206. PubMed ID: 29154259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
    Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimizing effective dose and image quality in cone beam CT sialography.
    Douglas DJ; Perschbacher SE; Moayedi M; Lam EWN
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 May; 135(5):686-697. PubMed ID: 36774241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD.
    Lofthag-Hansen S; Thilander-Klang A; Ekestubbe A; Helmrot E; Gröndahl K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Feb; 37(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 18239034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
    Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparison of absorbed and effective dose from two dental cone beam computed tomography scanners].
    Okano T; Matsuo A; Gotoh K; Yokoi M; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Koyama S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 22449896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology.
    Ludlow JB; Ivanovic M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 18504152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of the effective doses from two dental cone beam CT devices.
    Schilling R; Geibel MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120273. PubMed ID: 23420855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dose indices in dental cone beam CT and correlation with dose-area product.
    Araki K; Patil S; Endo A; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120362. PubMed ID: 23520392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?
    Cascante-Sequeira D; Oliveira-Santos C; Brasil DM; Santaella GM; Swanson C; Blackburn M; Scarfe WC; Haiter-Neto F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7881-7888. PubMed ID: 37993703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CONE BEAM CT IN DENTAL IMPLANT PLANNING: HOW CLOSE ARE PATIENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS WITH DATA FROM PHANTOM STUDIES FOUND IN LITERATURE?
    Kottou S; Zapros A; Stefanopoulou N; Krompas N; Tsapaki V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(3):321-326. PubMed ID: 31297525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computed tomography dose index and dose length product for cone-beam CT: Monte Carlo simulations.
    Kim S; Song H; Samei E; Yin FF; Yoshizumi TT
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 12(2):3395. PubMed ID: 21587186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effective dose estimation in cone-beam computed tomography for dental use by Monte-Carlo simulation optimizing calculation numbers using a step-and-shoot method.
    Ozaki Y; Watanabe H; Kurabayashi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Oct; 50(7):20210084. PubMed ID: 33929892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. CBCTs in a Swiss university dental clinic: a retrospective evaluation over 5 years with emphasis on radiation protection criteria.
    Klingler S; Biel P; Tschanz M; Schulze R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):5627-5636. PubMed ID: 37522991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simulation study on the conversion between CT and CBCT dose quantities via the effective dose.
    Ketelhut S; Kuhlmann ML; Büermann L; Pirl L; Borowski M
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Nov; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 37875106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels in dental cone beam computed tomography in Switzerland.
    Deleu M; Dagassan D; Berg I; Bize J; Dula K; Lenoir V; Ott B; Ott JG; Verdun FR; Weber R; Ziglinas P; Zingariello C; Sans Merce M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190468. PubMed ID: 32267774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.
    Pauwels R; Beinsberger J; Collaert B; Theodorakou C; Rogers J; Walker A; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 21196094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A preliminary study to determine the diagnostic reference level using dose-area product for limited-area cone beam CT.
    Endo A; Katoh T; Vasudeva SB; Kobayashi I; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(4):20120097. PubMed ID: 23420859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.