210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33113261)
1. Comparison of TRUS and combined MRI-targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy for the concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.
Aslan G; Çelik S; Sözen S; Akdoğan B; İzol V; Yücel Bilen C; Sahin B; Türkeri L;
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Mar; 75(3):e13797. PubMed ID: 33113261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL
Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy.
Kachanov M; Budäus L; Witt JH; Wagner C; Zinke J; Fangmeyer B; Schütte A; Spieker T; Beyersdorff D; Graefen M; Rachubinski P; Leyh-Bannurah SR
World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2955-2961. PubMed ID: 36357604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Goel S; Shoag JE; Gross MD; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Robinson B; Khani F; Baltich Nelson B; Margolis DJ; Hu JC
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 31492650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Targeted Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Quantitative Gleason 4 Grading Prediction in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance Candidate Selection.
Kachanov M; Budäus L; Beyersdorff D; Karakiewicz PI; Tian Z; Falkenbach F; Tilki D; Maurer T; Sauter G; Graefen M; Leyh-Bannurah SR
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Mar; 9(2):303-308. PubMed ID: 36184537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Engelbrecht MRW; Postema AW; van Kollenburg RAA; Hoeks CMA; Savci-Heijink CD; Van Sloun RJG; Wildeboer RR; De Reijke TM; Mischi M; Wijkstra H
BJU Int; 2020 Oct; 126(4):481-493. PubMed ID: 32315112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?
Osses DF; Drost FH; Verbeek JFM; Luiting HB; van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 32232921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of Gleason Score 3+4=7 prostate cancer upgrading at radical prostatectomy is significantly reduced by targeted versus standard biopsy.
De Luca S; Fiori C; Bollito E; Garrou D; Aimar R; Cattaneo G; De Cillis S; Manfredi M; Tota D; Federica M; Passera R; Porpiglia F
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Jun; 72(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 31619029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal sampling scheme in men with abnormal multiparametric MRI undergoing MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.
Freifeld Y; Xi Y; Passoni N; Woldu S; Hornberger B; Goldberg K; Bagrodia A; Raj G; Margulis V; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y; Francis F; Pedrosa I; G Roehrborn C; Costa DN
Urol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 37(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 30446460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Fourcade A; Payrard C; Tissot V; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Demany N; Serey-Effeil S; Callerot P; Coquet JB; Doucet L; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Nonent M; Fournier G; Valeri A
Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):174-179. PubMed ID: 29463177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.
Zattoni F; Marra G; Martini A; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Harkin T; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Marquis A; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Morlacco A; Kretschmer A; Barletta F; Heidegger I; Tilki D; van den Bergh R; Dal Moro F; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Novara G; Gandaglia G;
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 36746729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Improves Agreement Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score.
Porpiglia F; DE Luca S; Passera R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Bollito E; DE Pascale A; Cossu M; Aimar R; Veltri A
Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4833-9. PubMed ID: 27630337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.
Ahdoot M; Lebastchi AH; Long L; Wilbur AR; Gomella PT; Mehralivand S; Daneshvar MA; Yerram NK; O'Connor LP; Wang AZ; Gurram S; Bloom J; Siddiqui MM; Linehan WM; Merino M; Choyke PL; Pinsky P; Parnes H; Shih JH; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):176-186. PubMed ID: 33846112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu K; Qin Z; Xue J; Miao C; Tian Y; Liu S; Zhu S; Gu Q; Hou C; Xu A; Yang J; Wang Z
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Dec; 8(6):741-753. PubMed ID: 32038971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
