247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33113912)
1. A Toxicity Prediction Tool for Potential Agonist/Antagonist Activities in Molecular Initiating Events Based on Chemical Structures.
Kurosaki K; Wu R; Uesawa Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 33113912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular Image-Based Prediction Models of Nuclear Receptor Agonists and Antagonists Using the DeepSnap-Deep Learning Approach with the Tox21 10K Library.
Matsuzaka Y; Uesawa Y
Molecules; 2020 Jun; 25(12):. PubMed ID: 32549344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In Silico Molecular Docking and In Vivo Validation with
Jeong J; Kim H; Choi J
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 30857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep learning driven QSAR model for environmental toxicology: Effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals on human health.
Heo S; Safder U; Yoo C
Environ Pollut; 2019 Oct; 253():29-38. PubMed ID: 31302400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction Model with High-Performance Constitutive Androstane Receptor (CAR) Using DeepSnap-Deep Learning Approach from the Tox21 10K Compound Library.
Matsuzaka Y; Uesawa Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Sep; 20(19):. PubMed ID: 31574921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive modeling of estrogen receptor agonism, antagonism, and binding activities using machine- and deep-learning approaches.
Ciallella HL; Russo DP; Aleksunes LM; Grimm FA; Zhu H
Lab Invest; 2021 Apr; 101(4):490-502. PubMed ID: 32778734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The importance of molecular structures, endpoints' values, and predictivity parameters in QSAR research: QSAR analysis of a series of estrogen receptor binders.
Li J; Gramatica P
Mol Divers; 2010 Nov; 14(4):687-96. PubMed ID: 19921452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction Models for Agonists and Antagonists of Molecular Initiation Events for Toxicity Pathways Using an Improved Deep-Learning-Based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship System.
Matsuzaka Y; Totoki S; Handa K; Shiota T; Kurosaki K; Uesawa Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Oct; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 34639159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The applications of machine learning algorithms in the modeling of estrogen-like chemicals.
Liu H; Yao X; Gramatica P
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2009 Jun; 12(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19519328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of active and inactive agonists/antagonists of estrogen receptor based on Tox21 10K compound library: Binomial analysis and structure alert.
Wang J; Huang Y; Wang S; Yang Y; He J; Li C; Zhao YH; Martyniuk CJ
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 May; 214():112114. PubMed ID: 33711575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Machine learning models for predicting endocrine disruption potential of environmental chemicals.
Chierici M; Giulini M; Bussola N; Jurman G; Furlanello C
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2018; 36(4):237-251. PubMed ID: 30628533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpretable machine learning for the identification of estrogen receptor agonists, antagonists, and binders.
Piir G; Sild S; Maran U
Chemosphere; 2024 Jan; 347():140671. PubMed ID: 37951393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting Endocrine Disruption Using Conformal Prediction - A Prioritization Strategy to Identify Hazardous Chemicals with Confidence.
Sapounidou M; Norinder U; Andersson PL
Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 36534483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ecotoxicological QSAR modeling of endocrine disruptor chemicals.
Khan K; Roy K; Benfenati E
J Hazard Mater; 2019 May; 369():707-718. PubMed ID: 30831523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EDC-Predictor: A Novel Strategy for Prediction of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals by Integrating Pharmacological and Toxicological Profiles.
Yu Z; Wu Z; Zhou M; Cao K; Li W; Liu G; Tang Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Nov; 57(46):18013-18025. PubMed ID: 37053516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing QSAR Models with Defined Applicability Domains on PPARγ Binding Affinity Using Large Data Sets and Machine Learning Algorithms.
Wang Z; Chen J; Hong H
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(10):6857-6866. PubMed ID: 33914508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EDCs DataBank: 3D-Structure database of endocrine disrupting chemicals.
Montes-Grajales D; Olivero-Verbel J
Toxicology; 2015 Jan; 327():87-94. PubMed ID: 25451822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ANN and Bayesian classification models for virtual screening of endocrine-disrupting chemicals.
Nowicki P; Klos J; Kokot Z
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2014; 17(5):407-16. PubMed ID: 24547995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Deep Learning-Based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship System Construct Prediction Model of Agonist and Antagonist with High Performance.
Matsuzaka Y; Uesawa Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 35216254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
