190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33116237)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging based 3-dimensional printed breast surgical guide for breast-conserving surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ: a clinical trial.
Wu ZY; Alzuhair A; Kim H; Lee JW; Chung IY; Kim J; Lee SB; Son BH; Gong G; Kim HH; Seo JB; Ahn SH; Kim N; Ko B
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):18534. PubMed ID: 33116237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast-conserving surgery with 3D-printed surgical guide: a single-center, prospective clinical study.
Wu ZY; Kim HJ; Lee J; Chung IY; Kim J; Lee S; Son BH; Ahn SH; Kim HH; Seo JB; Jeong JH; Gong G; Kim N; Ko B
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2252. PubMed ID: 33500555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usefulness of 3D-surgical guides in breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant treatment.
Lee HS; Kim HJ; Chung IY; Kim J; Lee SB; Lee JW; Son BH; Ahn SH; Kim HH; Seo JB; Ahn JH; Gong G; Lee S; Kim N; Ko BS
Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3376. PubMed ID: 33564029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of breast MRI for surgical decision in patients with breast cancer: ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal carcinoma.
Lee J; Jung JH; Kim WW; Park CS; Lee RK; Kim HJ; Kim WH; Park HY
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):934. PubMed ID: 32993586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.
Yoon J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 21(8):946-954. PubMed ID: 32677379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Targeted Intraoperative Radiotherapy for the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.
Rivera R; Banks A; Casillas-Lopez A; Rashtian A; Lewinsky B; Sheth P; Hovannesian-Larsen L; Brousseau D; Iyengar G; Holmes DR
Breast J; 2016; 22(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 26534876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins after breast conserving surgery in patients with early non-mass breast carcinoma].
Li XS; Song YL; Li DC; Zhu HX; Meng LM; Huang RR; Wang SL; Wang D; Fang H; Fan HX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):768-774. PubMed ID: 29061022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.
Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Form Accurately Transfers Supine MRI-Derived Tumor Localization Information to Guide Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Barth RJ; Krishnaswamy V; Paulsen KD; Rooney TB; Wells WA; Rizzo E; Angeles CV; Marotti JD; Zuurbier RA; Black CC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 24(10):2950-2956. PubMed ID: 28766199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging system for intraoperative margin assessment for DCIS and invasive breast cancer using the ClearSight™ system in breast-conserving surgery-Results from a postmarketing study.
Thill M; Szwarcfiter I; Kelling K; van Haasteren V; Kolka E; Noelke J; Peles Z; Papa M; Aulmann S; Allweis T
J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(3):361-368. PubMed ID: 34724205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of specimen radiography in breast-conserving therapy of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Lange M; Reimer T; Hartmann S; Glass Ä; Stachs A
Breast; 2016 Apr; 26():73-9. PubMed ID: 27017245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI predictors of tumor-positive margins after breast-conserving surgery.
Bahl M; Baker JA; Kinsey EN; Ghate SV
Clin Imaging; 2019; 57():45-49. PubMed ID: 31128385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy evaluation of a 3D printing surgical guide for breast-conserving surgery using a realistic breast phantom.
Ock J; Lee S; Kim T; Hong D; Kim M; Ko BS; Kim N
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Oct; 137():104784. PubMed ID: 34438204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Randomized Prospective Trial of Supine MRI-Guided Versus Wire-Localized Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer.
Barth RJ; Krishnaswamy V; Paulsen KD; Rooney TB; Wells WA; Angeles CV; Zuurbier RA; Rosenkranz K; Poplack S; Tosteson TD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):3099-3108. PubMed ID: 31359283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Operative outcomes of conventional specimen radiography versus in-operating room specimen radiography in radioactive seed-localized segmental mastectomies.
Rhee D; Pockaj B; Wasif N; Stucky CC; Pizzitola V; Giurescu M; Patel B; McCarthy J; Gray R
Am J Surg; 2018 Jan; 215(1):151-154. PubMed ID: 28784236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
Choi YJ; Shin YD; Song YJ
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 14():126. PubMed ID: 27122132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction Model For Extensive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Around Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer.
Knuttel FM; van der Velden BH; Loo CE; Elias SG; Wesseling J; van den Bosch MA; Gilhuijs KG
Invest Radiol; 2016 Jul; 51(7):462-8. PubMed ID: 26863579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
